Oneness Doctrine In The Aramaic New Testament

[Michael The Disciple]

http://ad2004.com/prophecytruths/Articles/DivineNameNT.pdf

Try not to stumble over the fact the writer believes the Aramaic came before the Greek. A complete read will be a blessing for Oneness believers.

[Warmbee]

Read the first paragraph... so far it sounds interesting, I'm gonna print and read later.

[Trouvere]

Its okay its not our fault that he studied history biased.The New Testament was written in Greek.Thanks but no thanks.

[Michael The Disciple]

Its okay its not our fault that he studied history biased.The New Testament was written in Greek.Thanks but no thanks.

By chance did you read what he said about the deity of Christ?

[Praxeas]

Its okay its not our fault that he studied history biased.The New Testament was written in Greek.Thanks but no thanks.
There is evidence there was an original MS of Matthew written in hebrew/aramaic.

[Warmbee]

Haven't finsihed the whole article, but there is some good stuff in there. I showed some of it to my roomate and she loved it.

[KwaiQ]

Looks interesting. Thanks for the link.

[Sam]

There is evidence there was an original MS of Matthew written in hebrew/aramaic.

Some think that the Gospel of John (but not 1, 2, and 3 John and not the Revelation) was also originally written in Aramaic.

Some believe that the entire NT was written in Aramaic.

[KwaiQ]

Some think that the Gospel of John (but not 1, 2, and 3 John and not the Revelation) was also originally written in Aramaic.

Some believe that the entire NT was written in Aramaic.True. I'm not so sure myself. Of course arguments can be made for either.

This site is a proponent of Aramaic Primacy (http://www.aramaicpeshitta.com/)

This site is a proponent of Greek Primacy (http://www.sacrednamemovement.com/GNTIntro.htm)

[Iron_Bladder]

http://ad2004.com/prophecytruths/Articles/DivineNameNT.pdf

Try not to stumble over the fact the writer believes the Aramaic came before the Greek. A complete read will be a blessing for Oneness believers.




There is not one scrap of evidence for an Araimaic NT predating the Greek, if you have any proof then please do give it, as I'd love to see it. Aramaic versions such as the Preshita, post-date the Greek NT not pre-date it.

[Michael The Disciple]

There is no proof either way. No one in our generation has ever seen a copy of the original documents penned by the Apostles or early disciples.

It is logical however that since the disciples were Hebrew/Aramaic speakers they would speak to their kinsmen in the same. So I believe the earliest writings were in Hebrew/Aramaic. Can I prove it? No. Neither can Greek originals be proven. Speculated? Yes. Proven? No.

[Praxeas]

There is no proof either way. No one in our generation has ever seen a copy of the original documents penned by the Apostles or early disciples.

It is logical however that since the disciples were Hebrew/Aramaic speakers they would speak to their kinsmen in the same. So I believe the earliest writings were in Hebrew/Aramaic. Can I prove it? No. Neither can Greek originals be proven. Speculated? Yes. Proven? No.
The first disciples might have been hebrew but the church was not all hebrew speakers nor were the gospels written during the time of Jesus's sojourn here. Luke was not a Hebrew. Paul wrote to a mostly Gentile church.

Considering the late dates of the gospels and the epistles It's very likely most of them were written in Greek since Greek was the common language of the Roman empire including Palestine. It was the language of commerce