Jaunita Bynum on ABC Tomorrow !

[Thad]

<<<<<<<< BARF!>>>>>>>>>


http://blackgospelpromo.com/predesign/bynumonabc/



here's the link

[Thad]

SHOCKING STATEMENT BY JAUNITA !


Jaunita says in one of these articles that she is now going to take her place in the WORLD and NOT the church !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

can you believe that ???????????????????????

She is also giving a 7 page interview in Essence magazine! this magazine at times has been pretty racey !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

jaunita is now hawking soy candles and claiming to be the next Oprah winfry!!!

Tom Joyner Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6imMbOjYD40

Tom Joyner Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNR9p2uL5Fg...ted&search=

Tom Joyner Morning Show...Sheryl Underwood take on the Juanita Bynum Case
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZ-PBAqelGo...ted&search=

Star Jones Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bo_6Xera0JE...ted&search=

Star Jones part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZOG60e1Ap4...ted&search=

New York Times Article
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/20/us/20preacher.html?ref=us




ANY COMMENTS ??????

[redeemedcynic84]

She is also giving a 7 page interview in Essence magazine! this magazine at times has been pretty racey !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

if Playboy asked you to do an interview with them, would you turn it down???

I mean, it wouldn't be in the parts of the magazine with the pictures, you could speak AGAINST the pictures, and you could preach the gospel in its entirety in the interview... would you turn the interview down?? I wouldn't...

You need to wait until the article comes out to judge that, no matter what type of publication the interview is going to be in...

and I'm just not interested enough to listen to 15 minute conversations on a radio show... lol

[Thad]

if Playboy asked you to do an interview with them, would you turn it down???

I mean, it wouldn't be in the parts of the magazine with the pictures, you could speak AGAINST the pictures, and you could preach the gospel in its entirety in the interview... would you turn the interview down?? I wouldn't...

You need to wait until the article comes out to judge that, no matter what type of publication the interview is going to be in...

and I'm just not interested enough to listen to 15 minute conversations on a radio show... lol

you really think that would be okay??? WOW that's a little surprising to tell you the truth

I listened to just a little they literally make fun her & mock her

[redeemedcynic84]

you really think that would be okay??? WOW that's a little surprising to tell you the truth

I listened to just a little they literally make fun her & mock her

would people think it was ok? Probably not...

But how can someone say they are reaching everyone if they turn down the opportunity to explicitly (ok using that word in this sense is funny) preach the gospel to that many people... Have a pulpit that, yeah, isn't in a great place, but the nudity isn't on that page... It'd be like having a church next door to a strip club... yeah, it isn't a great spot for it, but at the same time, what better place to get the gospel to the dying and hurting from???

and, generally speaking, when people have Chrisitans on thier normal shows like that they make fun of them...

[ChicagoPastor]

Thad, some of those links don't work.

[Thad]

Thad, some of those links don't work.


well i sure tried - maybe someone can lend a hand


I knew she was going to milk this situation for all it was worth

[redeemedcynic84]

well i sure tried - maybe someone can lend a hand


I knew she was going to milk this situation for all it was worth

FYI...

the issue is your link isn't the full link...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZOG6......ted&search=

that address there, ellipsis included, is the weblink that you are linking to... You need to get the entire web address and make sure the hyperlink (not the text pasted in the thread) is a full web address (no ellipsis)

replace the * with an appropriate bracket ([ or ]):
*URL="http://www.youtube.com"* http://www.website.com */URL*

the ="site" part needs to be a complete address, it doesn't matter what the text (the second instance of the url) says, it can say "BOO!!" or "Star Jones" or whatever else you want...

[Thad]

oh okay thanks

[tv1a]

The following may shock the AFF conservative faction. Please do not read if you have heart problems:

I saw one of her conference a few weeks ago on Daystar. I was disappointed. She had huge billboards of her candle business on stage and tables of product in front of the stage. I forget the name of the conference, but JB did not deliver. The conference was more like a glorified Amway convention. She was talking about her business and how her candles were going to make her wealthy. Even if half the audience bought one candle she would have grossed over $100,000 in candle sales alone.

I lost all respect for her. If she is going to have a Candle Party, she shouldn't disguise it as a conference and make people pay to attend. She's a fraud. Bynum has a dangerous agenda.

Here's a nice recap of JB's recent events. (Written by a woman)

http://www.apostasyalert.org/REFLECTIONS/jezebel.htm





SHOCKING STATEMENT BY JAUNITA !


Jaunita says in one of these articles that she is now going to take her place in the WORLD and NOT the church !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

can you believe that ???????????????????????

She is also giving a 7 page interview in Essence magazine! this magazine at times has been pretty racey !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

jaunita is now hawking soy candles and claiming to be the next Oprah winfry!!!

Tom Joyner Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6imMbOjYD40

Tom Joyner Part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sNR9p2uL5Fg...ted&search=

Tom Joyner Morning Show...Sheryl Underwood take on the Juanita Bynum Case
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZ-PBAqelGo...ted&search=

Star Jones Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bo_6Xera0JE...ted&search=

Star Jones part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZOG60e1Ap4...ted&search=

New York Times Article
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/09/20/us/20preacher.html?ref=us




ANY COMMENTS ??????

[revrandy]

Maybe she is the New Star Jones...

[MissBrattified]

if Playboy asked you to do an interview with them, would you turn it down???

Are you kidding me? My husband had better say, "Get Thee Behind Me Satan!" No way should ANY Christian do an interview with Playboy! GASP! My goodness, LB, what would be the reason to associate yourself with that sort of thing??????? :crazy

[redeemedcynic84]

Are you kidding me? My husband had better say, "Get Thee Behind Me Satan!" No way should ANY Christian do an interview with Playboy! GASP! My goodness, LB, what would be the reason to associate yourself with that sort of thing??????? :crazy

read the rest of it...

Its not like you'd tell all the men in your church to go buy that issue... But how can you turn down getting the gospel in the hands of that many people?? (even if it had to be accompanied with the bad stuff that is in that mag, too)

[MrsMcD]

read the rest of it...

Its not like you'd tell all the men in your church to go buy that issue... But how can you turn down getting the gospel in the hands of that many people?? (even if it had to be accompanied with the bad stuff that is in that mag, too)

There's other ways to get the gospel in the hands of many.

[MissBrattified]

read the rest of it...

Its not like you'd tell all the men in your church to go buy that issue... But how can you turn down getting the gospel in the hands of that many people?? (even if it had to be accompanied with the bad stuff that is in that mag, too)

I did read the rest of your post. :crazy

So, LB, would you be in favor of church advertisements and commercials placed on Pay-Per-View Porn channels?

[bdlooney]

SHOCKING STATEMENT BY JAUNITA !

She is also giving a 7 page interview in Essence magazine! this magazine at times has been pretty racey !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

So then it is not right to do an interview with magazine that is SOMETIMES racey but it is perfectly fine to advertise, preach and minister on tv which is ALWAYS racey, lewd and inappropriate? Is this correct? Surely I am not reading this correctly, am I?

[rgcraig]

So then it is not right to do an interview with magazine that is SOMETIMES racey but it is perfectly fine to advertise, preach and minister on tv which is ALWAYS racey, lewd and inappropriate? Is this correct? Surely I am not reading this correctly, am I?

The world is racy, lewd and inappropriate - - unless you live up in the mountains/cave somewhere.

[redeemedcynic84]

I did read the rest of your post. :crazy

So, LB, would you be in favor of church advertisements and commercials placed on Pay-Per-View Porn channels?

you realize there are no commercials on pay-per-view channels, right?

And if they let us put them on there and let us point out that we are against the porn, then, yeah...

I mean, seriously, you realize that Playboy would NEVER let someone say the things I proposed to say in its magazine, right? They would never let someone in an interview get preachy or speak about how people shouldn't read playboy...

[redeemedcynic84]

So then it is not right to do an interview with magazine that is SOMETIMES racey but it is perfectly fine to advertise, preach and minister on tv which is ALWAYS racey, lewd and inappropriate? Is this correct? Surely I am not reading this correctly, am I?

ok, can we all just stop and agree that this is the most hilarious thing that we have ever read???

ALL television (even stuff like Nick, Jr. and PBS Kids and such) is worse than a "sometimes lewd" magazine?!?! Seriously????

:killinme

someone needs to stop listening to the hype and actually sit down and watch tv for 10 minutes if they think every second of tv is worse...

[bdlooney]

The world is racy, lewd and inappropriate - - unless you live up in the mountains/cave somewhere.

I am not talking about the world. I am talking about the fact that some believe it wrong to be featured in a SOMETIMES racey magazine but are alright with being featured on tv which is ALWAYS racey. Now that is inconsistency!

[redeemedcynic84]

I am not talking about the world. I am talking about the fact that some believe it wrong to be featured in a SOMETIMES racey magazine but are alright with being featured on tv which is ALWAYS racey. Now that is inconsistency!

www.bigidea.com

those shows are on tv every Saturday morning...

www.skyangel.com

more tv channels that aren't racy or lewd ever...

even TBN or Nickalodean (although one could argue Nick at Nite is starting to get to where they have a few shows that are arguably racy at times)

need I really go on???

[rgcraig]

I am not talking about the world. I am talking about the fact that some believe it wrong to be featured in a SOMETIMES racey magazine but are alright with being featured on tv which is ALWAYS racey. Now that is inconsistency!

Well, a couple points.

- My point is the world is full of racy, lewd and inappropriate things and it surrounds you daily.

- TV is not ALWAYS racy. There are many channels that offer good programming, but you wouldn't know that since you don't have a TV.

- Playboy is ALWAYS racy.

[bdlooney]

ok, can we all just stop and agree that this is the most hilarious thing that we have ever read???

ALL television (even stuff like Nick, Jr. and PBS Kids and such) is worse than a "sometimes lewd" magazine?!?! Seriously????

:killinme

someone needs to stop listening to the hype and actually sit down and watch tv for 10 minutes if they think every second of tv is worse...

OH! So then we are going to be advertising only on Nick Jr. and PBS kids? Come on!

Practically no one will advertise their church on these stations. People will want channels like ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox and no one can tell me that these stations are not lewd nor inappropriate.

[redeemedcynic84]

OH! So then we are going to be advertising only on Nick Jr. and PBS kids? Come on!

Practically no one will advertise their church on these stations. People will want channels like ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox and no one can tell me that these stations are not lewd nor inappropriate.

www.bigidea.com

those shows air on either CBS or NBC

Nick, Jr's stuff airs on, I think NBC

Disney Channel shows air on ABC

Fox has thier own kids "network" that either airs on the Fox affiliate or a secondary affiliate, depending on the market at certain times of the day...

and there is tons of stuff, even on primetime, that is not lewd...

As someone who watches tv, I can tell you, it isn't as bad as you think it is (and it probably isn't as "ok" as I think it is)

[rgcraig]

OH! So then we are going to be advertising only on Nick Jr. and PBS kids? Come on!

Practically no one will advertise their church on these stations. People will want channels like ABC, CBS, NBC and Fox and no one can tell me that these stations are not lewd nor inappropriate.

They will not be able to afford those stations.

They will advertise on local cable channels.

I think his point to you is that not ALL of TV is racy.

[bdlooney]

As someone who watches tv, I can tell you, it isn't as bad as you think it is (and it probably isn't as "ok" as I think it is)

Thank you, Redeemed! I will agree with you here.:friend

[redeemedcynic84]

They will not be able to afford those stations.

They will advertise on local cable channels.

I think his point to you is that not ALL of TV is racy.

actually, my church looked into some tv advertising...

you can get 20 spots that will air between 7-9 AM or 5-6 PM on weekdays (during news programming) on a local affiliate for like $55 a spot in groups of 20 (so $1100)... that isn't really all that bad, and the 5 o'clock news is watched by a ton of people, so that ad (although not necessarily the 7-9 AM one) would get seen by a ton of people...

although, yeah, the cable ads are much cheaper than that (couple bucks a spot)

(note: all of this doesn't include the cost of making a commercial, but it can't be more than a couple hundred with how cheap equiptment and video editing software is nowadays)

[bdlooney]

Well, a couple points.

- My point is the world is full of racy, lewd and inappropriate things and it surrounds you daily.

- TV is not ALWAYS racy. There are many channels that offer good programming, but you wouldn't know that since you don't have a TV.

- Playboy is ALWAYS racy.

Clarification: The magazine in question is not Playboy, it is Esquire. I will agree that Playboy is ALWAYS racy.

[redeemedcynic84]

Clarification: The magazine in question is not Playboy, it is Esquire. I will agree that Playboy is ALWAYS racy.

the thread diverged some after post 1 and before you posted... I thought you were talking about Playboy at first, too lol...

(note: my bad...)

[MissBrattified]

you realize there are no commercials on pay-per-view channels, right?

How would I know? :coffee2

And if they let us put them on there and let us point out that we are against the porn, then, yeah...

I mean, seriously, you realize that Playboy would NEVER let someone say the things I proposed to say in its magazine, right? They would never let someone in an interview get preachy or speak about how people shouldn't read playboy...

So what's the point, then? Why even present the hypothetical in which you would intertwine yourself with such a smutty publication?

[rgcraig]

I believe all the fuss over advertising on TV would be easier to understand if I knew that the majority of UPC saints and many ministers didn't ever watch it.

However, when you know the majority have no problem watching it, then the whole argument is just dumb.

[Mercy]

what would be the reason to associate yourself with that sort of thing??????? :crazy

To save the people we look down on so they wont come to church to hear it. Meeting them on a level playing field to elevate them to a higher understanding they may not get.

[rgcraig]

To save the people we look down on so they wont come to church to hear it. Meeting them on a level playing field to elevate them to a higher understanding they may not get.

I can understand the thinking here, but honestly, didn't Jesus go to the sinners?

Someone looking at racy magazines are searching for something - that's why they are looking at those magazines, so who's to say finding an ad giving them hope or an option couldn't reach out and touch them?

I think we really do limit ourselves sometimes.

[Theresa]

I believe all the fuss over advertising on TV would be easier to understand if I knew that the majority of UPC saints and many ministers didn't ever watch it.

However, when you know the majority have no problem watching it, then the whole argument is just dumb.

stop and think about it...

how many churches would YOU want to see broadcast on tv?? I can just see some churches version of "Helicopter" being aired....and how do you explain the running and pew jumping??

I've heard preachers say they have a hard enough time keeping their saints saved - how in the world to they expect to handle an influx of the unchurched when we fail in the new convert care and teaching of our "regulars"

NOT ALL churches, but many...


and they are some of the loudest against the resolution....

[rgcraig]

stop and think about it...

how many churches would YOU want to see broadcast on tv?? I can just see some churches version of "Helicopter" being aired....and how do you explain the running and pew jumping??

I've heard preachers say they have a hard enough time keeping their saints saved - how in the world to they expect to handle an influx of the unchurched when we fail in the new convert care and teaching of our "regulars"

NOT ALL churches, but many...


and they are some of the loudest against the resolution....Oh, I'm with you on that for sure. I was addressing advertising on TV more than broadcasting a service.

You are SO right about the lack of new convert care and teaching.

[bdlooney]

stop and think about it...

how many churches would YOU want to see broadcast on tv?? I can just see some churches version of "Helicopter" being aired....and how do you explain the running and pew jumping??
I've heard preachers say they have a hard enough time keeping their saints saved - how in the world to they expect to handle an influx of the unchurched when we fail in the new convert care and teaching of our "regulars"

NOT ALL churches, but many...


and they are some of the loudest against the resolution....
.
What do you mean by the bolded?

[Elizabeth]

stop and think about it...

how many churches would YOU want to see broadcast on tv?? I can just see some churches version of "Helicopter" being aired....and how do you explain the running and pew jumping??



Stop making so much sense will ya? ;)

[Theresa]

Oh, I'm with you on that for sure. I was addressing advertising on TV more than broadcasting a service.

You are SO right about the lack of new convert care and teaching.

the broadcasting was just my extra 2 cent observation...

I think the whole debate is silly anyway...those that can will, those that can't wont..and everyone else will continue on in the way they are currently.

Those that want to be on TV for the reasons the UCs are so afraid of - well, they'll find a way. Things have a way of sorting themselves out.

I think that either side of the issues (tv, standards etc) need to just decided if being in the UPC is their best option and either get on board with the direction its going or get out before they get bitter and destroy themselves...

how complicated is this, really??

I think A LOT of stuff could be worked out on our knees.....

[Theresa]

Stop making so much sense will ya? ;)

its REALLY not at all complicated.


like I said above....it would ALL work itself out if folks spent a whole lot of time on their knees. God is funny that way, you know?

[MrsMcD]

I believe all the fuss over advertising on TV would be easier to understand if I knew that the majority of UPC saints and many ministers didn't ever watch it.

However, when you know the majority have no problem watching it, then the whole argument is just dumb.

It is dumb.

[MissBrattified]

Well, for one thing its worth noting that if you advertise on a specific channel or in a particular magazine, you are, in effect, supporting them. I think that advertising on a generic channel or just in a secular magazine is one thing, but to advertise on a channel or in a magazine that specializes in X-rated material? I don't see the need for that.

As for being embarrassed by some churches being on TV...nah. I think some of the stuff on TBN is MUCH more gag-worthy. I've seen folks dancing around and jumping and running aisles on a number of non-Apostolic programs. That's nothing new and nothing to worry about.

There are kooks in every group. Most people are smart enough to know that already, and the kooks won't be all that popular. Then again...there is TBN to think about....LOL!

[rgcraig]

the broadcasting was just my extra 2 cent observation...

I think the whole debate is silly anyway...those that can will, those that can't wont..and everyone else will continue on in the way they are currently.

Those that want to be on TV for the reasons the UCs are so afraid of - well, they'll find a way. Things have a way of sorting themselves out.

I think that either side of the issues (tv, standards etc) need to just decided if being in the UPC is their best option and either get on board with the direction its going or get out before they get bitter and destroy themselves...

how complicated is this, really??

I think A LOT of stuff could be worked out on our knees.....
I think a lot of stuff God has to sit there shaking his head thinking why don't they just love me and tell others I died for them.

[Theresa]

I think a lot of stuff God has to sit there shaking his head thinking why don't they just love me and tell others I died for them.

BINGO


Like he TOLD us to do.....

HELLO - anyone read the gospels lately????

the whole SALT and LIGHT thing we are supposed to be fulfilling???


I have to shut up, I've already said this on another thread.....

I'm just as guilty as the next person but it bothers me to see so much talent and energy WASTED on unnecessary things....we waste SO MUCH TIME talking about what an organization should do!!!

like I said before - it's not Hazelwoods responsibility to reach my lost loved ones....

[Elizabeth]

its REALLY not at all complicated.


like I said above....it would ALL work itself out if folks spent a whole lot of time on their knees. God is funny that way, you know?

one thing is for certain you cant have ought in your heart for your brother or sister if you are praying for them-thats one thing that would happen for sure. If that makes sense-

[Theresa]

one thing is for certain you cant have ought in your heart for your brother or sister if you are praying for them-thats one thing that would happen for sure. If that makes sense-

my husband and I don't have the best marriage - it's a LOT of work and it's very very hard......and I know why. I was backslid, living in sin when we got together and we started out wrong...so we have an uphill battle to fight.

BUT - the only place that it can be fixed is in the prayer room.


and it's hard, I know it is...I'm the most stubborn person besides my husband, and we have problems when I refuse to get on my knees and address the issues...and be CONSISTANT.

You know, I really hate the devil, he has people so confused and bound...when he's nothing really. All smoke and mirrors..he has NO power over our prayer. He's got so many bound by a whole lot of "what ifs" and things that will never be...if we'd just pray.

He's so stupid, and we are so gullible. I'd like to just smack him one good time and tell he to just stop bothering me and distracting me.


I have to hush, my soap box is getting a work out today!

can you tell I'm eat up with conviction today? LOL

[LaVonne]

I appreciate what you ladies are saying here...Renda, MissB, Theresa and Jeanie!

[LaGirl]

I havent read this entire thread....did anyone SEE good morning america this morning? i recorded it.

[Theresa]

ok, since this is where the ladies are...my mom is sending a test picture of the Tampa airport to test our system of "reporting" from conference :)

lets see how this will work..she is supposed to send me pictures of the clothes, the fads, all the new things :)

[rgcraig]

I appreciate what you ladies are saying here...Renda, MissB, Theresa and Jeanie!

Who said women can't preach! :killinme

[Theresa]

http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r263/yakkowakodot/tampaairport.jpg

[LaGirl]

http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r263/yakkowakodot/tampaairport.jpg

looks good to me! :saycheese

[Theresa]

looks good to me! :saycheese

I thought so too..great quality from her cell phone :)

[Elizabeth]

I appreciate what you ladies are saying here...Renda, MissB, Theresa and Jeanie!Hi there Miss Carey!:wave

[MissBrattified]

I thought so too..great quality from her cell phone :)

Theresa, you should put those pics on a GC thread...they'll get lost on here!

[rgcraig]

http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r263/yakkowakodot/tampaairport.jpg

Looks like it works.

[LaGirl]

I thought so too..great quality from her cell phone :)

very good quality from a cell phone

[LaVonne]

Who said women can't preach! :killinme

That's right, Sista!

[Theresa]

Theresa, you should put those pics on a GC thread...they'll get lost on here!

I will, when she starts sending them. This is just where the ladies were at the moment I got my first text from Tampa LOL

[LaVonne]

Hi there Miss Carey!:wave

Hi Jeanie!

[LaVonne]

I will, when she starts sending them. This is just where the ladies were at the moment I got my first text from Tampa LOL

Alright...thanks!

It is a good picture.

[redeemedcynic84]

How would I know? :coffee2


lol for one there is more "pay per view" than just the porn kind... and none of them have commercials (I mean... seriously, $50 for Boxing or MMA fights? If they had commercials there'd be riots!!)

So what's the point, then? Why even present the hypothetical in which you would intertwine yourself with such a smutty publication?

Because the point I was trying to make is if someone presents you with the opportunity to spread the gospel, you should take it...

[MissBrattified]

lol for one there is more "pay per view" than just the porn kind... and none of them have commercials (I mean... seriously, $50 for Boxing or MMA fights? If they had commercials there'd be riots!!)

It was TIC, RC. LOL. :rolleyes: We've watched PPV movies before! I just forgot that they don't have commercials...although I do seem to remember some advertisements between showtimes, but maybe it was just for other movies.

Because the point I was trying to make is if someone presents you with the opportunity to spread the gospel, you should take it...

I agree with your generic statement, but I think there are exceptions. As I mentioned before, advertising in publications and within certain programming is financial support for that publication and/or that programming, and therefore it would have to be considered whether or not paying their bills warranted a spot where "sinners" are definitely going to see the ad, and how that would look overall in the public eye, both Christian and secular alike.

There is a point when "don't let your good be evil spoken of" DOES come into play...isn't there? Is there ever a point that it should matter?

Maybe I'm not thinking out of the box enough. *shrug*

[Elizabeth]

ok, since this is where the ladies are...my mom is sending a test picture of the Tampa airport to test our system of "reporting" from conference :)

lets see how this will work..she is supposed to send me pictures of the clothes, the fads, all the new things :)

So far so good! Please keep the reports coming!

You could start your own thread too :saycheese

[redeemedcynic84]

It was TIC, RC. LOL. :rolleyes: We've watched PPV movies before! I just forgot that they don't have commercials...although I do seem to remember some advertisements between showtimes, but maybe it was just for other movies.

SINNER!!

and, yeah, they used to have some "filler" stuff in between the time the movie ends and a half-hour block that the next one can start (so, the movie runs 105 minutes including the end credits, but it is scheduled for 2 hours, so they have 15 minutes of "filler" which is basically nothing-fluff or whatever ads for other movies they are showing on PPV are in between, but the assumption is no one is actually watching the channel during this time)

Nowadays, however, PPV is almost all "in Demand" where you essentially rent the movie for a block of time and can play, rewind, fast forward, etc. the movie for that period of time...

I agree with your generic statement, but I think there are exceptions. As I mentioned before, advertising in publications and within certain programming is financial support for that publication and/or that programming, and therefore it would have to be considered whether or not paying their bills warranted a spot where "sinners" are definitely going to see the ad, and how that would look overall in the public eye, both Christian and secular alike.

There is a point when "don't let your good be evil spoken of" DOES come into play...isn't there? Is there ever a point that it should matter?

Maybe I'm not thinking out of the box enough. *shrug*

I would say advertising would be crossing the line because of the financial/support aspect of it... if Playboy has no advertisers, they don't exist... so why help them exist by advertising in it???

I was referring to if Playboy asked to interview you (and it wasn't being done at the Playboy Mansion lol) and you could teach the gospel in the interview, how could one turn it down, ya know?

and there is a point where that comes into play, I think advertising (and thus paying for the magazine to exist) is probably at that point, but if they want to give us free space in thier magazine, I don't see why we should turn it down...

(not that they ever would, but whatever)

[Thad]

Post it here in Thad's Tab Theresa ! will you?

[Thad]

well did anyone sis SISTER JAUNITA Today ???

If so, your Thoughts


I think she;s milking this for all it's worth and trying to get a foot hold in mainstream media

[Theresa]

Post it here in Thad's Tab Theresa ! will you

when they come in, I'll put them in the GC thread, which ever one is active and posting the play by play
and I'll put it on the tab :)

[Thad]

when they come in, I'll put them in the GC thread, which ever one is active and posting the play by play
and I'll put it on the tab :)

alright

[Elizabeth]

well did anyone sis SISTER JAUNITA Today ???

If so, your Thoughts


I think she;s milking this for all it's worth and trying to get a foot hold in mainstream media

so she was on today? I am confused!

It said wednesday and the 27th on that ad.

[MissBrattified]

so she was on today? I am confused!

It said wednesday and the 27th on that ad.

Nice observation...I didn't even notice that...

[Thad]

so she was on today? I am confused!

It said wednesday and the 27th on that ad.

Jeani it was this morning on "godd morning america" BUT i posted it Yesterday evening

I probably should have said "Today" since most people don't stay up past 7 pm around here

[MissBrattified]

LIz it was this morning on "godd morning america" BUT i posted it Yesterday evening

I probably should have said "Today" since most people don't stay up past 7 pm around here

LOL, THAD...it wasn't YOUR mistake...on the ad you linked in your first post...it says "September 27th", and then further down it says "WEDNESDAY."

[Thad]

LOL, THAD...it wasn't YOUR mistake...on the ad you linked in your first post...it says "September 27th", and then further down it says "WEDNESDAY."

okay does this help Jeanie ?

[MissBrattified]

okay does this help Jeanie ?

There's an article talking about the interview, but no video posted. (yet)

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=3651790&page=1

[Thad]

There's an article talking about the interview, but no video posted. (yet)

http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=3651790&page=1


post it when you can for jeanie and Keith - they are HUGE fans of JB you know

[Elizabeth]

post it when you can for jeanie and Keith - they are HUGE fans of JB you know

Oh please!

I think my/our opinion has changed a little.

[Elizabeth]

okay does this help Jeanie ?

Thad thats what I was trying to tell you!:thwak

[revrandy]

post it when you can for jeanie and Keith - they are HUGE fans of JB you know

:D

[Elizabeth]

:D

oh be quite!:razz:club