PDA

View Full Version : **HILARY** Now 30 Points Ahead!!!!!!


Thad
10-20-2007, 12:42 PM
Eat your Heart out Ferdmiester!!!! lol

She's a show in and will be the ext president of the USA

BrotherEastman
10-20-2007, 12:46 PM
Say it aint so! NNNOOOOOOO!!!!!!

Thad
10-20-2007, 12:54 PM
Hilary Supporters
Tim
Dora
Dan A
NLYP
Thad
light
Renda
Sherri
Rosebud

anyone else i missed??

philjones
10-20-2007, 01:36 PM
Hilary Supporters
Tim
Dora
Dan A
NLYP
Thad
light
Renda
Sherri
Rosebud

anyone else i missed??

Is this a prayer list?:hypercoffee

bishoph
10-20-2007, 02:29 PM
It goes to show that it don't take much smarts for them demonscrats to foller someone. The "hilarity" of it all! ROFL You all can't even get her name right! (Hilary) lol :snapout

Thad
10-20-2007, 02:39 PM
It goes to show that it don't take much smarts for them demonscrats to foller someone. The "hilarity" of it all! ROFL You all can't even get her name right! (Hilary) lol :snapout


I know you support her too- don't ask me how I know

RevBuddy
10-20-2007, 02:52 PM
Thad:

I'm just glad she's a "show in" and not a shoe-in. And besides that, I'm thankful she'll be the "ext president" and not the next president.

Thank God.

Thad
10-20-2007, 02:53 PM
Thad:

I'm just glad she's a "show in" and not a shoe-in. And besides that, I thanksful she'll be the "ext president" and not the next president.

Thank God.


the "ext" president ?

bishoph
10-20-2007, 02:53 PM
I know you support her too- don't ask me how I know


I vehemently protest!

Let it be known this 20th day of October, in the year of our Lord 2007 that I wouldn't vote for Hillary Clinton if she were the last candidate left on the earth!

For all those whose minds want to know.....it has nothing to do with her being a woman....I think there are many women who could do the job. I just don't want a Marxist/socialist in office, I want to think I'm free!:feral

RandyWayne
10-20-2007, 02:54 PM
Hilary, the only thing she is truly an expert on is cattle -that and covering up bimbo eruptions.

Thad
10-20-2007, 02:55 PM
at least 91% of the black community will vote for Hillary.

the exception will be JUdge Thomas :reaction

RandyWayne
10-20-2007, 03:00 PM
You mean there are only 10 blacks in America?

BrotherEastman
10-20-2007, 03:25 PM
You mean there are only 10 blacks in America?
LOL! That ain't right randy!

mizpeh
10-20-2007, 04:29 PM
the "ext" president ?

You need a spell checker, Thad. (or maybe a quick once over before you hit...submit) :thwak

http://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/showpost.php?p=276361&postcount=1

CC1
10-20-2007, 04:36 PM
Eat your Heart out Ferdmiester!!!! lol

She's a show in and will be the ext president of the USA

Is a "show in" similar to a "shoe in"?

As I recall she is thirty points ahead of Obama, not a Republican.

Right now the Democrat field is very narrow with Hillary running away with the nomination in the Dem polls.

The Republican race has no clear frontrunner so there is much less focus right now.

Once the respective Democrat and Republican nominees are decided is when we will see how each is doing in polling pitted against one another.

I think a Hillary Obama ticket is going to be formiddable because they will appeal to every extreme lib group in the nation. All the liberated left wing lesbian women will be voting for Hillary and Obama will insure a heavy turnout of the already 90+% locked in black vote that the Dems have due to pandering and insuring the welfare reservation continues.

timlan2057
10-20-2007, 04:53 PM
Hmm ... not sure where you got that I was a Hillary supporter.

I'm not NECESSARILY.

At this stage, I could vote for anyone from Fred Thompson to Hillary Clinton.

To me, I think illegal immigration is the biggest single issue in the country today and NO candidate is really stepping up to face it.

Now politically I am still a registered Republican though the older I get the more Libertarian I get.

No, I am not a crusading social conservative any more though I am a fiscal conservative.

I think I still am in doctrinal lockstep (not that it matters) with my political idol, Richard Nixon, who was not a doctrinaire conservative but had a large libertarian streak. He could also surprise with some liberal tendencies such as the wage-price freeze.

He has been quoted in his old age as saying he knew he had many gays in his administration. It was not something he was obsessed about. He did not go out of his way to praise their lifestyle but did not crusade against what went on their bedrooms either with some kind of vendetta.

This thread does bring out something funny though.

I find it amazing that from the "ole time pentecost" perception, CC1 is considered a "liberal" whom they believe would unavoidably open the door to all kinds of immorality because he does not accept extra-biblical legalism.

Shoot, CC1 is a right-wing reactionary. :pirate

He and Ferd claim they LOVE democracy.

Yeah, they love it until the election doesn't go their way and then they moan and whine that the majority in this country are dumb if they don't support every "rob from the poor and give to the rich" scheme that George W. Bush comes up with.

Well ... it's called "democracy" for a reason.

And no ... I don't necessarily support Hillary Clinton though I could end up voting for her.

Tell you what though, I bet a guy at work 100 bucks that she WILL be our next President, whether I support her or not.

She's got the Democrat nomination locked up and you people who think she won't be a formidable candidate that the Republicans won't have an uphill fight against are just whistling Dixie in the graveyard.

And you can blame George W. Bush's arrogant, imperialistic presidency for just about handing her the keys to the White House in 2008.

stmatthew
10-20-2007, 04:58 PM
Hmm ... not sure where you got that I was a Hillary supporter.

I'm not NECESSARILY.

At this stage, I could vote for anyone from Fred Thompson to Hillary Clinton.

To me, I think illegal immigration is the biggest single issue in the country today and NO candidate is really stepping up to face it.

Now politically I am still a registered Republican though the older I get the more Libertarian I get.

No, I am not a crusading social conservative any more though I am a fiscal conservative.

I think I still am in doctrinal lockstep (not that it matters) with my political idol, Richard Nixon, who was not a doctrinaire conservative but had a large libertarian streak. He could also surprise with some liberal tendencies such as the wage-price freeze.

He has been quoted in his old age as saying he knew he had many gays in his administration. It was not something he was obsessed about. He did not go out of his way to praise their lifestyle but did not crusade against what went on their bedrooms either with some kind of vendetta.

This thread does bring out something funny though.

I find it amazing that from the "ole time pentecost" perception, CC1 is considered a "liberal" whom they believe would unavoidably open the door to all kinds of immorality because he does not accept extra-biblical legalism.

Shoot, CC1 is a right-wing reactionary. :pirate

He and Ferd claim they LOVE democracy.

Yeah, they love it until the election doesn't go their way and then they moan and whine that the majority in this country are dumb if they don't support every "rob from the poor and give to the rich" scheme that George W. Bush comes up with.

Well ... it's called "democracy" for a reason.

And no ... I don't necessarily support Hillary Clinton though I could end up voting for her.

Tell you what though, I bet a guy at work 100 bucks that she WILL be our next President, whether I support her or not.

She's got the Democrat nomination locked up and you people who think she won't be a formidable candidate that the Republicans won't have an uphill fight against are just whistling Dixie in the graveyard.

And you can blame George W. Bush's arrogant, imperialistic presidency for just about handing her the keys to the White House in 2008.

Tim, I tend to agree with you. I too believe she will win and be the next President. Bush has put a negative mark on the Republican party that will not be soon forgotten.

philjones
10-20-2007, 05:03 PM
Well, while we are agreeing with Tim, i will say that I too, as I have become older, have developed more libertarian tendencies with a strong fiscal conservatism. I am not of the opinion that we are intended to live in a theocracy... I am of the opinion that we should each have freedom to pursue our religious beliefs with no interference from government...The obvious common sense exceptions regarding the individual rights of others still apply

NLYP
10-20-2007, 05:42 PM
Hilary Supporters
Tim
Dora
Dan A
NLYP
Thad
light
Renda
Sherri
Rosebud

anyone else i missed??

Ok...not to be bold but I would NEVER even support the dem party...let alone that woman from hell.

Queers, gay rights, same sex marriage, abortion....on and on...dem agenda.

Straightline...this is for you...

The direction for the dems aganda to hell fire is indeed a straightline.

Sorry Thad....wrong on this one.

lovinglife
10-20-2007, 06:00 PM
at least 91% of the black community will vote for Hillary.

the exception will be JUdge Thomas :reaction

not if Obama runs.........he will pull a majority of that vote ....if they run together....right wingers are in trouble.........with the way bush has fumbled everything up in recent times....... dems could bring in vladimir putin and win.......(i know weird analogy)

Thad
10-20-2007, 06:18 PM
Is a "show in" similar to a "shoe in"?

As I recall she is thirty points ahead of Obama, not a Republican.

Right now the Democrat field is very narrow with Hillary running away with the nomination in the Dem polls.

The Republican race has no clear frontrunner so there is much less focus right now.

Once the respective Democrat and Republican nominees are decided is when we will see how each is doing in polling pitted against one another.

I think a Hillary Obama ticket is going to be formiddable because they will appeal to every extreme lib group in the nation. All the liberated left wing lesbian women will be voting for Hillary and Obama will insure a heavy turnout of the already 90+% locked in black vote that the Dems have due to pandering and insuring the welfare reservation continues.


just a slight typo.

CC1, you must be in denial. you know good and well that the only one who even has a chance in hell to beat her is Guiliani and you know it.

BUT!!! He wont win!!! You know why?? the christian based voters are not going to vote for him! most of the major organizations have already made that clear simply because he is pro choice. the christian base made up 40% of Bush's votes. If the christians come up with a party candidate, it's all over and your favorite politician, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON will be YOUR Next president :pirate:pirate:pirate:pirate

CC1
10-20-2007, 06:39 PM
just a slight typo.

CC1, you must be in denial. you know good and well that the only one who even has a chance in hell to beat her is Guiliani and you know it.

BUT!!! He wont win!!! You know why?? the christian based voters are not going to vote for him! most of the major organizations have already made that clear simply because he is pro choice. the christian base made up 40% of Bush's votes. If the christians come up with a party candidate, it's all over and your favorite politician, HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON will be YOUR Next president :pirate:pirate:pirate:pirate

I agree that the Republican field this year is problematic. The two guys who probably best represent my views and have a tidy personal ife were Bronwback who just quit and the Gov. of Ark, Huckabee. However both are pretty bland and have not caught on.

Rudy has the best chance of winning some of the northern states that can swing either way but you are correct that he would cause a lot of the evangelical Christian vote to just stay home. They will not vote for Hillary but many won't vote for him due to his position on abortion and homosexaulity.

I really like Fred Thompson but he is not a regular church going man and has a much younger hot wife. Those two things are going to be an obstacle for many conservative Christians who otherwise like him.

I am not as pessimestic as all of you are though regarding the general election because Hillary still has a very high negative in the polls. That is people who say they would never vote for her. Hers is higher than any canidate.

We won't know how well the Republican canidate is going to do against her until we have a Republican canidate and the Repub and Dem start campgaining against each other head to head.

I do find it surprising that so many of you seem to take glee in the idea of Hillary becoming President. It would be a tragedy for any Christian opposing abortion, homosexuality and socialism.

Thad
10-20-2007, 07:02 PM
I agree that the Republican field this year is problematic. The two guys who probably best represent my views and have a tidy personal ife were Bronwback who just quit and the Gov. of Ark, Huckabee. However both are pretty bland and have not caught on.

Rudy has the best chance of winning some of the northern states that can swing either way but you are correct that he would cause a lot of the evangelical Christian vote to just stay home. They will not vote for Hillary but many won't vote for him due to his position on abortion and homosexaulity.

I really like Fred Thompson but he is not a regular church going man and has a much younger hot wife. Those two things are going to be an obstacle for many conservative Christians who otherwise like him.

I am not as pessimestic as all of you are though regarding the general election because Hillary still has a very high negative in the polls. That is people who say they would never vote for her. Hers is higher than any canidate.

We won't know how well the Republican canidate is going to do against her until we have a Republican canidate and the Repub and Dem start campgaining against each other head to head.

I do find it surprising that so many of you seem to take glee in the idea of Hillary becoming President. It would be a tragedy for any Christian opposing abortion, homosexuality and socialism.

really? who for instance ??

SoCaliUPC
10-20-2007, 07:17 PM
Thad....

Off the subject....

But are you for or against communism?

SoCaliUPC
10-20-2007, 07:25 PM
Thad....

Off the subject....

But are you for or against communism?

:bump

Thad
10-20-2007, 07:29 PM
Thad....

Off the subject....

But are you for or against communism?


what a ridiculous Question you know I'm against that

BrotherEastman
10-20-2007, 07:32 PM
what a ridiculous Question you know I'm against that
Just so you know, the Communist Party of the U.S.A supports the Democrats. (seriously)

Thad
10-20-2007, 07:33 PM
Just so you know, the Communist Party of the U.S.A supports the Democrats. (seriously)

I just don't believe that

SoCaliUPC
10-20-2007, 07:34 PM
what a ridiculous Question you know I'm against that

Actually, it is not ridiculous...and have to ask it of every person I come into contact with that supports Hillary Clinton for President. Hillary Clinton's stand on the issues and her plan of action if she was elected as President has communist overtones to them. It is widely known that her views are very much that of a communist...and why some overlook that, I have no idea. Is it because they don't agree with Bush and hate him so much they are looking for another Clinton? As Hillary said in a recent debate...she is not her husband. She has that right...she is worse!

Saying all of that, why do you support Hillary for President?

BrotherEastman
10-20-2007, 07:35 PM
I just don't believe that
www.cpusa.org

Thad
10-20-2007, 07:37 PM
Actually, it is not ridiculous...and have to ask it of every person I come into contact with that supports Hillary Clinton for President. Hillary Clinton's stand on the issues and her plan of action if she was elected as President has communist overtones to them. It is widely known that her views are very much that of a communist...and why some overlook that, I have no idea. Is it because they don't agree with Bush and hate him so much they are looking for another Clinton? As Hillary said in a recent debate...she is not her husband. She has that right...she is worse!

Saying all of that, why do you support Hillary for President?



She has NEVER stated that she is for communism-have you ever heard her say such or provide the quote ?

SoCaliUPC
10-20-2007, 07:38 PM
I just don't believe that

Thad...he is absolutely correct. I invite you to check out their website. After reviewing their stand on issues and what they want, I invite you to then read Hillary's statements and her views.

I think you will be quite surprised.

After that, I would like to know who you will be voting for in the California primary.

SoCaliUPC
10-20-2007, 07:40 PM
She has NEVER stated that she is for communism-have you ever heard her say such or provide the quote ?

Thad....she is too smart to come out and say she is for communism. It is another one of those "C" words you just do not utter.

However, her statements have very communist overtones to them. You can structure words to say what you want without really saying the obvious.

BrotherEastman
10-20-2007, 07:41 PM
She has NEVER stated that she is for communism-have you ever heard her say such or provide the quote ?
I have provided you a link, and I promise that they SUPPORT the Democratic Party w/lobbyist money.

BrotherEastman
10-20-2007, 07:42 PM
Vote Michael Savage! LOL!

SoCaliUPC
10-20-2007, 07:42 PM
Vote Michael Savage! LOL!

Oh puhleeeeze!

BrotherEastman
10-20-2007, 07:42 PM
www.cpusa.org
*bump for thad*

Thad
10-20-2007, 07:43 PM
i looked at the link however! That still doesn't Prove that SHE is a communist does it? anymore than the KKK voting for Bush- does that make him a racist ?

BrotherEastman
10-20-2007, 07:43 PM
Oh puhleeeeze!
lighten up will ya.

BrotherEastman
10-20-2007, 07:44 PM
i looked at the link however! That still doesn't Prove that SHE is a communist does it? anymore than the KKK voting for Bush- does that make him a racist ?
Do you know of any politician in America that will boldly declare that they are a commie?

BrotherEastman
10-20-2007, 07:45 PM
Do you know of any politician in America that will boldly declare that they are a commie?
I didn't think so. LOL!

SoCaliUPC
10-20-2007, 07:46 PM
i looked at the link however! That still doesn't Prove that SHE is a communist does it? anymore than the KKK voting for Bush- does that make him a racist ?

Thad....looking at the front page of their website will not give you the answers that you need. You actually need to read their positions on the issues. Then...I invite you to go to Hillary's site and read her views. I also invite you to listen very carefully to her at the debates. How people have glossed over her statements...are just beyond me.

Your analogy of the KKK voting for Bush and making him a racist is not an accurate analogy. Bush has not made pro-White overtones and statements on the issues.

Hillary has made communist overtones.

Thad
10-20-2007, 07:47 PM
Am i under some kind of assult now ???

BrotherEastman
10-20-2007, 07:49 PM
Am i under some kind of assult now ???
No thad, just trying to educate you. LOL! Love ya man, bye.

SoCaliUPC
10-20-2007, 08:23 PM
Thad...you are not under assault. I just want you to be educated when you go to the polls.

CC1
10-20-2007, 09:01 PM
Thad....she is too smart to come out and say she is for communism. It is another one of those "C" words you just do not utter.

However, her statements have very communist overtones to them. You can structure words to say what you want without really saying the obvious.

You are absolutely correct. The Democrat party has been taken over by the fringe left wing.

Hillary and the liberal Dems want to nationalize (socialize) health care. The first shot in that effort was fired this past week when the Dems passed a bill through the House and Senate that was supposed to provide healthcare for indigent children but in fact covered children whose parents earn over $80,000 per year! If President Bush had not veoted that and it had become law down the road the next step would have been to say that since we are covering the elderly with Medicare and the young with that program we just need to fill in the middle.

Democrats also want to bring back the so called "fairness doctrtine" where there would no longer be freedom of the airwaves. Since liberal radio is a huge failure commercially the Dems want to legislate that radio stations must provide matching time for libs to counter conservative talk shows like Rush Limbaugh's and Sean Hannity. This is nuts because they are commercial endeavors on private radio stations. There are no tax dollars involved and the shows live or die (just like lib ones have) by their success in the marketplace. This is big brother at its worst.

Dems are for the Federal government controlling more and more of our lives. They are committed ot appoint Federal judges and Supreme Court justices that will continue to erode the very principles that made America great.

Sure President Bush and the REpublicans are not as conservative as Republicans have been at times but compared to the goals and vision of the Dems the Republicans are many times better.

I believe it is a responsbility as a Christian to vote for canidates who both have a reasonable chance of winning and are the canidate whose positions most reflect Christian principles.

Just the fact alone that Dems want to appoint judges who will push an ani church, anti God, pro abortion, pro homosexual agenda is enough reason why no Christian should vote for them.

Down the road if things flip and REpublicans become socialist godless libs and Dems become conservatives supporting traditional family values, etc then I will vote Dem.

pelathais
10-20-2007, 09:11 PM
Hillary has got so many skeletons.

latimes article (http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-donors19oct19,0,4231217.story?coll=la-home-center)

Turns out decrepit vacant apartments were the sources of $1000 and $2000 donations. Apartments in several "Chinatown" areas that were funnelled to her campaign by a citizen of the People's Republic of China (Communist China). Others who "gave" were impoverished immigrants who do not appear to be the types to be able to be so generous to wealthy politicians.

SoCaliUPC
10-20-2007, 09:17 PM
Another question I ask people who support Hillary is their stand on abortion, gay marriages, etc. and other unbiblical issues that the democrats champion in their agenda.

CC1
10-20-2007, 09:26 PM
Another question I ask people who support Hillary is their stand on abortion, gay marriages, etc. and other unbiblical issues that the democrats champion in their agenda.

It blows my mind that any Christian would even consider voting for the Dem party as it is today.

You don't have to be a Bush fan to appreciate the importance of the two conservative Supreme Court justices he appointed They may not be fundamentalist Chrisitans but they are constructionsists and at least will have slowed the judicial rush towards persecuting the church and fully implementing a godless agenda.

Thad
10-20-2007, 09:28 PM
Another question I ask people who support Hillary is their stand on abortion, gay marriages, etc. and other unbiblical issues that the democrats champion in their agenda.

and republicans will be voting for Giuliana- have you seen his track record on these issues ?

SoCaliUPC
10-20-2007, 09:39 PM
and republicans will be voting for Giuliana- have you seen his track record on these issues ?
This Republican will not be voting for Giuliani on the primary.

CC1
10-20-2007, 09:42 PM
This Republican will not be voting for Giuliani on the primary.

Nor me but I would vote for him in the general election against Hillary or any of the other Dem canidates.

While I disagree with his social positions I think he would be a strong leader when it comes to National Security and the economy.

pelathais
10-20-2007, 09:44 PM
and republicans will be voting for Giuliana- have you seen his track record on these issues ?
Not necessarily. Remember this campaign started off a whole year earlier than in the past. Rudy has great organizational skills and those skills show in the early going when you need to have effective orgs already operating in Iowa, NH and SC and other early primary states.

But we've also got an extra year of grind for our candidates this time around. A lot can change in the course of a presidential campaign. And we've got 12 extra months for that to happen.

But, despite disagreements on a host of issues I would vote for Rudy over any of the Dems any day. And I would vote for Rudy rather than sit at home on election day as well.

Thad
10-20-2007, 09:44 PM
This Republican will not be voting for Giuliani on the primary.


he pledges to do everything he can to decrease abortion and elect conservative supreme Court appointees- this doesn't suffice at all?

Hillary is coming to my area this week- I might go hear her speech

SoCaliUPC
10-20-2007, 10:03 PM
Nor me but I would vote for him in the general election against Hillary or any of the other Dem canidates.

While I disagree with his social positions I think he would be a strong leader when it comes to National Security and the economy.
I agree. In one of the first debates as well, he was the only one that outlined a plan for immigration....a huge deal here. However, saying that, he is not my first choice amongst the Republicans.

SoCaliUPC
10-20-2007, 10:06 PM
he pledges to do everything he can to decrease abortion and elect conservative supreme Court appointees- this doesn't suffice at all?

Hillary is coming to my area this week- I might go hear her speech

Thad...he very well may...but in the primary election, I will not be voting for Giuliani.

I have to ask you are voting for Hillary for what? What issues do you agree with her on?

Straightline
10-20-2007, 10:30 PM
Ok...not to be bold but I would NEVER even support the dem party...let alone that woman from hell.

Queers, gay rights, same sex marriage, abortion....on and on...dem agenda.

Straightline...this is for you...

The direction for the dems aganda to hell fire is indeed a straightline.

Sorry Thad....wrong on this one.

Thank you!! (I guess).
:saycheese

She that speaks with forked tongue
cannot spit a
Straightline

Sam
10-20-2007, 10:38 PM
Do you know of any politician in America that will boldly declare that they are a commie?

Gus Hall did.
For several elections he was the presidential candidate for the Communist Party.

I don't know if we still have the Communist and Socialist parties on the presidential ballot or not. Actually, the Democratic party is doing such a good job of advancing the ideals of those two parties they probably don't have to run a candidate of their own.

CC1
10-20-2007, 11:15 PM
Gus Hall did.
For several elections he was the presidential candidate for the Communist Party.

I don't know if we still have the Communist and Socialist parties on the presidential ballot or not. Actually, the Democratic party is doing such a good job of advancing the ideals of those two parties they probably don't have to run a candidate of their own.

Iti s clear that the Socialist extremist wing of the Democrat party is firmly in control. All of the conservative Democrats in the South became Republicans after the Reagan Revolution in the 80's. There were a few moderate Dems elected to congress this last election in marginally Republican districts but not enough to stand up to Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Hillary Clinton, Ted Kennedy, and the rest of the loons.

BrotherEastman
10-21-2007, 06:49 AM
Gus Hall did.
For several elections he was the presidential candidate for the Communist Party.

I don't know if we still have the Communist and Socialist parties on the presidential ballot or not. Actually, the Democratic party is doing such a good job of advancing the ideals of those two parties they probably don't have to run a candidate of their own.
Did Gus ever get elected? This is my point as to why others won't declare themselves as communistic. LOL!

CC1
10-21-2007, 07:58 AM
Did Gus ever get elected? This is my point as to why others won't declare themselves as communistic. LOL!

For rabid "true believers" of an ideology winning does not matter. That explains why so many Christians including some on this board waster their time and vote on fringe canidates like Ron Paul who have zero chance of winning. In fact zero chance of even being taken seriously as a canidate by more than a few percnetage points of Americans.

stmatthew
10-21-2007, 12:32 PM
A vote for Hilary is a vote for the "great tribulation"!

RandyWayne
10-21-2007, 12:41 PM
A vote for Hilary is a vote for the "great tribulation"!

Or as some famous people would say "It would be like voting for your first wife."

BrotherEastman
10-21-2007, 03:03 PM
Or as some famous people would say "It would be like voting for your first wife."
LOL!

deacon blues
11-06-2008, 08:30 AM
Thought I would bump this. Kind of interesting to see what we were talking about before the Messiah emerged!

Ferd
11-06-2008, 10:18 AM
Thought I would bump this. Kind of interesting to see what we were talking about before the Messiah emerged!

LOL! looks like I dont have to "eat my heart out"


Thanks Deac!