![]() |
Quote:
And I agree with you on that, Sis. But I can't help but consider the collateral damage that goes along with those heavy statements...not damage to me particularly, but certainly to many of the little babes in the Lord. :angelsad |
Interesting and sad story. Unfortunately, its not only individuals that have taken this path, but also churches.
Too many times, I've seen or known of churches that first decided to step away from the "standards", glorying in their newfound "freedom". But check them out a year later and ... their baptism doctrine has changed; their salvation doctrine changes; they begin to tolerate, then accept, Trinitarian doctrine... next thing you know, they're no longer Apostolic any more. I'm not really extreme myself on the standards thing -- I consider myself to be moderately conservative. But it never ceases to amaze me how so many churches and pastors have started off by leaving the standards, and eventually departing from Apostolic doctrine altogether. I've seen it happen over and over; I don't have a clear explanation for why one ends up leading to another (since there's no direct link between the standards and Acts 2:38/Oneness). I guess in many cases there's just a latent spirit of compromise there, that starts with one area and then ends up leading to compromise in other areas. Just my 2 cents . |
Quote:
|
This is a great thread.
|
Re: The High Price of Intentional Indiscretions
Quote:
I try to be respectful of my more conservative dressing brothers and sisters, but obviously this young woman had a 'heart' problem to wear immodest clothing. I wouldn't be so concerned with the casual dress pants and ring on the young man's hand, but I would be more concerned with a sheer blouse and a short skirt. Just thinking about this thread and thought we might want to re-visit it. Blessings, Rhoni |
Re: The High Price of Intentional Indiscretions
Just thinking about this thread and thought we might want to re-visit it.
Blessings, Rhoni ------ I have been going to a UPCI church for 21 years. I have no church background before this. Nothing. What I have concluded in that 21 years, is that if a church body CONTINUALY presses the guilt button on the outward appearance WITHOUT love, we will always have precious men and women of God scream and run for the hills :runhills because the INWARD heart issues were not dealt with. The question that ran and still runs through my mind is, "Will I still be loved if....if I say what's really on my mind? How I really feel about this issue?" There are so many things that happen to a young child in life and then we bring all this baggage with us to church and here comes sister holier than thou, and says with pointed finger, "you're gonna go straight to hell if you keep cutting that hair!." ( my hands are accually shaking right now!) We are not called of God to point fingers. **We cannot punish people for being honest, or they will secretly hold inside their true feelings, sharing their thoughts with only a few close friends or they will explode!**:reaction We are called to share the gospel, to advise...one plants , one waters, but God does the rest. Some people that know me might be surprised at how I really feel about some things. I choose and want to please God. He is the one who molds and fashions me into the vessel he wants me to be. We need to pray for each other and for pasters and their wives and familys that these inner heart emotions about living up to the "S" word... of church society does not become our righteousness that we wear, but His righteousness that we cloth ourselves with. |
Re: The High Price of Intentional Indiscretions
I believe church discipline should start off with love and the spirit of meekness, giving the person space to repent, and then it escalating up from there.
The following are scriptures that I believe suit church discipline and illustrate good principles to use: Matt 18:15-19. Gal 6:1 Brethren, if a man be overtaken in a fault, ye which are spiritual, restore such an one in the spirit of meekness; considering thyself, lest thou also be tempted. 1Co 4:18 Now some are puffed up, as though I would not come to you. 1Co 4:19 But I will come to you shortly, if the Lord will, and will know, not the speech of them which are puffed up, but the power. 1Co 4:20 For the kingdom of God is not in word, but in power. 1Co 4:21 What will ye? shall I come unto you with a rod, or in love, and in the spirit of meekness? 2Co 12:21 And lest, when I come again, my God will humble me among you, and that I shall bewail many which have sinned already, and have not repented of the uncleanness and fornication and lasciviousness which they have committed. My personal opinion is that church discipline should start off with going to a person alone and with love and the spirit of meekness and using the word of God, then giving the person space to repent. After the space, if the person still hasn't chang'd, then get 1 or 2 others and go to that person with the word and then give the person space to repent again. If after this space, the person still hasn't chang'd, then take it to the church leadership to deal with him and give him space to repent. Finally, after that space, if the person still hasn't chang'd, then bring it before the whole church and let that person be like unto a heathen person and a publican. 1 Cor 5 shows how Paul dealt with one and I believe 2 Cor 2:1-10 shows Paul's admonishing the truth to re-fellowship with him. Its easy for people to rise up in judgement against those who rebel, but Paul wanted to see if they could be obedient in ALL THINGS by receiving him back, forgiving him, and showing love back to him. Now some believe that disobedient and/or rebellious people should not be dealt with at all, but that it should be left up to God to deal with them; essentially leaving the wheat and tares to grow together until the end. However, let me remind you that the interpretation of that parable was given later and that "the field is the world". The field is the world NOT the church. The bible is very specific that part of the responsibility of the ministry is to reprove and rebuke; not to show off spiritual muscle and power and authority, but because as a watchman and shepherd, you love that sheep and know that if they continue in what they are doing, it will be harmful for them. Thy rod and thy staff they comfort me - the rod is for correction. 1 Cor 5:6 and Gal 5:9 shows that a little leaven leaveneth the whole lump. Because Achon took an idol and hid it in his tent, thousands of God's holy people who were innocent and on the front lines lost their lives even tho they did absolutely nothing wrong. One's man's disobedience caused thousands of innocents to die at the hands of their enemies. Since they had a leader called of God to be their leader, he sought after God to reveal the root cause of the problem and it was revealed and it was taken care of and after that God's people had victory over the enemies of their souls again. Leaven that is not dealt with in a church will cause the enemies of God's people to have victory over them. A compromising church will lose its power and become a weak church. God wants his church to be a beacon of light and a shining example to the world where they can go and get deliverance, but a compromised church that is losing its power, loses its witness. That is why Paul said that he turned some over to Satan to learn not to blaspheme - basically for the destruction of the flesh that the Spirit may be saved - that they would learn. If a loving mother say her little boy with a fork going towards an outlet but still far away from it, she might say with loving concern, honey don't do that you are going to hurt yourself. If the boy doesn't listen, she might raise her voice and point to him with a stern face and say, I said don't do that, you are going to hurt yourself. Finally, if the boy still persists, she might get up and smack him really hard. Why did she do these things? Because she wants to abuse her power and authority and show off her spiritual muscle? No, because she loves and cares for the little boy and knows that he will get hurt if not die - she does it for him. So should the watchman and Pastor of the church in my opinion. Glory to God! |
Re: The High Price of Intentional Indiscretions
Quote:
|
Re: The High Price of Intentional Indiscretions
Quote:
Like it or not, the ministry has a God given responsibility to reprove, rebuke, and correct. I'll be the first to admit that my one analogy does not fit all situations. New born babes in the Lord do not know all of the dangers that they might face, whereas seasoned saints who know the word are more knowledgeable. Hence, a mother might be quicker to scold a teenager that has been warned about something over and over again. I'm aware that some do not take correction well. Heb 12:8 But if ye be without chastisement, whereof all are partakers, then are ye bastards, and not sons. Pro 15:10 Correction is grievous unto him that forsaketh the way: and he that hateth reproof shall die. But for wise men... Pro 9:8 Reprove not a scorner, lest he hate thee: rebuke a wise man, and he will love thee. Finally... Pro 13:24 He that spareth his rod hateth his son: but he that loveth him chasteneth him betimes. |
Re: The High Price of Intentional Indiscretions
Quote:
I have met a few with an agenda. I have met several who have a perspective. I was only 'beaten' by those with an agenda. And that bolded part...that's only when they are in the Word, and not the manual. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.