![]() |
Re: Jesus forsaken?
Quote:
If he did NOT feel the things He said and merely said them to fulfill scripture, then his words were lies, brother. They were not true of Himself. Jesus is not a liar. Nor is He another person apart from God Almighty. HIS HUMANITY ACTUALLY FELT FORSAKEN. |
Re: Jesus forsaken?
Quote:
DID HE NEED TO BE BAPTIZED OR NOT? Brother Blume what Brother Burk said was crystal clear. In Jesus name Brother Benincasa www.OnTimeJournal.com |
Re: Jesus forsaken?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Jesus forsaken?
David Bernard wrote this in THE ONENESS OF GOD
Quote:
Is Bernard clear enough? Quote:
Maybe David Bernard is not Oneness, though. |
Re: Jesus forsaken?
There was nothing about Jesus that had anything to do with sin until He went to the cross, and then it was our sins, not His. So his baptism was for no need of sin. He did it for our example. But that is a far cry from crying in agony about His human nature feeling forsaken after having taken our sins upon Hiimself. He was not lying nor pretending nor just fulfilling prophecy. To say He merely said it to fulfill prophecy loses the point of the whole prophecy which actually was foretelling he would cry those words forth in utterance of what He REALLY felt. He fulfilled prophecy as well as ACTUALLY FELT what He said. HE DID NOT LIE.
I agree with Bernard about this. But I guess you think that means we're not oneness. Ok. Whatever you say. :) Like I'm really going to take your words over Bernard's,... no offense intended. I have Bernard's email address and you can give him the same shake-down you did to me about this. lol ;) |
Re: Jesus forsaken?
Quote:
|
Re: Jesus forsaken?
Quote:
I mean no disrespect toward Bro. Bernard, but since you brought him up…in their Godhead debate, didn't Bernard tell the Trinitarian preacher, Gene Cook, Jr., that they both believed in the SAME God? :uhoh Either way, I am “One God,” and I am not looking for a way to assimilate with Trinitarian teachings on the godhead. I am also not looking for ways to include Trinitarians in the pulpit or label them as “apostles.” So you go ahead and agree with whoever you want... Be blessed in your studies…. |
Re: Jesus forsaken?
Quote:
I do believe that He had to be. Because he is our high priest. The high priest had to ritually wash, or be baptized, before entering into service. Jesus came to fulfill the law, not to destroy it. Therefore, he had to be baptized in order to fulfill that obligation of the high priest. |
Re: Jesus forsaken?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Jesus forsaken?
If one believes "the blood is applied" only in baptism, then the baptism of Christ gets to be very strange indeed.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:52 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.