![]() |
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
I go to a UPC and i am not hostile to any of the other churches in town - good friends with the Lutheran Pastor, Christian Church minister and several baptist pastors. :)
|
Re: Suggestion
It's amazing to see people coming out of the woodwork for this thread... If you would actually post sometimes, there would be some interesting discussions.
It seems to be that some believe that certain debates should be off the table - while others believe that everything is worth debating. I think many people (myself included) will play devil's advocate (skip the easy joke here please) in order to better understand why we believe the things we do. The points I argue are not always indicative of where I stand. Some are, and some are hypothetical. I attend a UPC church. We believe in repentence, baptism in Jesus name (22 last Sunday), and receiving the Holy Ghost with evidence of speaking with other tongues. I realize that alone isn't enough my many's standards, but I am apostolic. And in my opinion, everything worth believing is worth questioning. There are great people on this forum. I don't agree with all of them, but I enjoy the conversation. If you are so easily derailed by the conversations then why not go find a "pat me on the back" style forum where everyone can tell each other how great they are. I guess I don't get. If you don't like it - why stick around? |
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
We are having an AoG pastor as a guest speaker in August and hopefully a Baptist pastor from the church next door yet this year. Tomorrow we have a guest who will speaking for @ 10 minutes from the Gideons. We are a non affiliated church with a pastor that holds license with the UPC. Hope that makes me Apostolic enough for ya all.:heart:heart |
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
I would just say - it's fine to stick around and disagree with the bulk of the threads if need be. There are a great many "rooms" here even a prayer room. So everyone find something you enjoy and let the rest of the world go by... :thumbsup |
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
I was an ultra, ultra con. I am much more moderate now. Jesus is more interested in saving people, than saving them (Acts 2:38), only to condemn them to hell for trimming their split ends, or wearing a pair of pants. Here is the problem with ultra cons, when your views (not necessarily yours Bro. Rutledge, but those ultra con views in general)-are challenged, they cannot be backed up with sound scriptural arguments in some cases. Any view should have solid biblical basis, or should be abandoned in favor of one that does. PS-I do still believe and preach One God, Acts 2:38, holiness, and biblical Christianity. |
Re: Suggestion
The common denominator here is baptism in Jesus Name and the baptism of the Holy Ghost, but, to some, that is far from enough to qualify as either Apostolic or saved.
A question for Pastor Epley: What portion of the "Jesus Name" movement qualifies as "Apostolic?" And a couple more: Would Jim Yohe be able to maintain a membership on any Jesus Name forum other than AFF? Would any other forum publish Sister Newman's articles? FCF did. |
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
If your definition of "Apostolic church" is: Repentance Baptism (by immersion) in the name of Jesus Holy Ghost with the evidence of speaking in other tongues That would be my church! :thumbsup If your definition is what some people call "standards" (I prefer "preference and/or "convictions") - well I hold them - my pastor holds them and teaches them (but not every service) - but we have many people who are welcome to worship with us who don't.... |
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:42 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.