Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea (Post 127866)

More puppeteering on the part of my UC PAJC brethren

Originally Posted by Charlie Brown (Post 127814)

I disagree with you, unless of course they never believed Apostolic doctrine to begin with.

If I believe that it takes Jesus name Baptism, and the infilling of the holy ghost to make it, and then I go on TBN and lead sinners in a "sinners prayer", and then tell them they are saved, do I really believe what I used to??

Originally Posted by JTULLOCK (Post 127860)

You have seen them pray the Roman Road and then say now you are saved? give me break.

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster (Post 127869)

Nope.

Here's what disturbs me about this repetitive conversation with Daniel and others who have left what they once proclaimed as truth.

They deny the power of the name in baptism. They deny the fact that God's Spirit comes with signs following. They deny everything aside from repentance is essential to salvation.

And here is the kicker. They then go on to say that we are part of the same movement.

Hogwash.

For once, why not call it what it is. They have returned to a pre-twentieth century understanding of Oneness Pentecostalism. They have rejected the basic tenants of the Apostolic faith. They have embraced the greater whoredom of Christendom in the name of ecumenicalism and tolerance.

Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind (Post 127871)

Our fingering will mean nothing.

"Have we not said Lord, Lord, and in that day I will say I never knew you..."

Everyone gets to go to Heaven- not Everyone gets to stay there.

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea (Post 127866)

More puppeteering on the part of my UC PAJC brethren

Originally Posted by JTULLOCK (Post 127872)

Too many attached strings I guess....I think that it is funny with these people. If someone for years follows exactly what they do then they are considered brethren. However, once they stick up for what they really believe then they are out cast as people who believe heresy.

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster (Post 127869)

Nope.

Here's what disturbs me about this repetitive conversation with Daniel and others who have left what they once proclaimed as truth.

They deny the power of the name in baptism. They deny the fact that God's Spirit comes with signs following. They deny everything aside from repentance is essential to salvation.

And here is the kicker. They then go on to say that we are part of the same movement.

Hogwash.

For once, why not call it what it is. They have returned to a pre-twentieth century understanding of Oneness Pentecostalism. They have rejected the basic tenants of the Apostolic faith. They have embraced the greater whoredom of Christendom in the name of ecumenicalism and tolerance.

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster (Post 127869)

Nope.

Here's what disturbs me about this repetitive conversation with Daniel and others who have left what they once proclaimed as truth.

They deny the power of the name in baptism. They deny the fact that God's Spirit comes with signs following. They deny everything aside from repentance is essential to salvation.
And here is the kicker. They then go on to say that we are part of the same movement.

Hogwash.

For once, why not call it what it is? They have returned to a pre-twentieth century understanding of Oneness Pentecostalism, and true Apostolic power is absent from that understanding. They have rejected the basic tenants of the Apostolic faith. They have embraced the greater whoredom of Christendom in the name of ecumenicalism and tolerance.

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster (Post 127877)

Not true. You left us when you left the faith.

Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea (Post 127878)

You're understanding of truth ... is base on a portion of the Oneness movement ... and it's only 80-90 years old .... it's not what the primitive church believed .....

Once again you put words in people's mouths ... and stand behind your religious garbs satisfied in your idol of perceived truth.