![]() |
Re: WPF in talks with Philippines UPC
Quote:
You is wrong. Since the WPF is NOT licensing anyone, and only giving fellowship cards, they are within the guidelines of the UPCI for being a FELLOWSHIP. Thus the UPCI would have to go against their current rules to discharge anyone that is a member of both. To be a member of the WPF is no different than being a member of the AWCF, the ICOF, or the NCO. |
Re: WPF in talks with Philippines UPC
Quote:
|
Re: WPF in talks with Philippines UPC
Quote:
Not being a WPF member or even an apologist for them I'm really not qualified to answer. But since that has never stopped anyone around here from spouting off just about any thought that ever entered their vacuous head. I'll join in the fray. 1. I'll take Booker, Goddair et al at their word until proven differently. Do you know something the general public hasn't been made aware of. 2. Absolutely, the UPCi has set a pressident by allowing membership in all kinds of different "fellowships". The AWCF being just one of many. The WPF does not at this time issue license/offer ordination so they are really no different than what others have been doing for years. Now the UPC doesn't like this group because they have billed themselves as an alternative to the UPC and are conservative but that doesn't change the reality of it just the response to it. 3. Who cares how many joined/are going to join. What does that have to do with the discussion about the PI. Now if this was a sanctioned UPCi group creating some subsiduary of Hazelwood we would have heard by now that almost 5000 attended, 15000 joined, 30000 are thinking about joining, 50000 got the Holy ghost including 43 house pets. This information being confirmed by counting the number of thumbs, fingers, toes and paws that were seen exiting the building. :) It's true that if you don't ask these questions you won't get answers but it might behoove you to ask the questions of someone else who actually might know the answers as opposed to just repeatedly asking them of people who don't have a clue. Last time I checked Larry Booker's phone number was still in the directory and I doubt that it was suddenly changed after he went to Tulsa. Call him up, I'm sure he would love to hear from you. :) |
Re: WPF in talks with Philippines UPC
Quote:
|
Re: WPF in talks with Philippines UPC
Quote:
Keep it up, my friend! No need to be an apologist for the WPF! Just apply common sense! The Plumbline is a Straightline |
Re: WPF in talks with Philippines UPC
Quote:
Matt: I was at Tulsa, and agree with your reporting. If more of these posters had went, they would have had a clear picture (the same picture), also. THIS is why I went: Not to join, but to see it for myself, and draw my own conclusions. Has anyone heard the results of the PI trip and can post the facts?? Or is speculation what we do (enjoy) best??? Even the Police officer will pronounce you are in your right mind when you walk that Straightline |
Re: WPF in talks with Philippines UPC
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: WPF in talks with Philippines UPC
Quote:
However, the way in which the UPCI responds is the real measure of any substantial differences between the competing orgs, and so far Hazelwood has done zilch. That fact alone would seem to indicate 1. That either Hazelwood doesn't really have concerns about the WwPF; or 2. That Hazelwood has already decided to let which ever brothers who have already chosen to do so, to part in peace; or 3. That Hazelwood is incapable of doing anything about it. Either way, incapable or unwilling - so far the UPCI has done nada. That's the real story, IMHO. |
Re: WPF in talks with Philippines UPC
Quote:
|
Re: WPF in talks with Philippines UPC
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:27 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.