2O TH CENTURY PAJC OP TRADITION ....

What other commands were important enough to be recorded? zilch, zero, nada, none! The main body of his response was encapsulated in 38. It was enough. It was clear. The proper response to the gospel is Acts 2:38.

Dan..

Do you believe TBN promotes the Gospel of Jesus Christ and Who he is?

Save yourselves from this untoward generation ... seems like a command to me ..... Heard brother Huntley preach a powerful message ... on this other command after verse 38 .... which BTW isn't the end of the message.

Well if the AS was about the New Birth, I am horribly sorry I have ever slammed it. I have no problem signing a document affirming my belief in the only saving message to the world. However, I don't believe that is what it was about at all. It was about standards.

If The Gospel of Jesus Christ is his death and resurrection ... then yes ... if it is WHAT SOME PAJCERS believe then no they don't teach that ACTS 2:38 IS THE GOSPEL ...

I assume that they teach he is the Son of God and that he is God. Do they use the semantics you and I do ... I don't know ... don't watch it.

Then why this big arguement to defend Ex-Apostolics promoting the Trinity on TBN by being there???

Even CS ....who knew Westberg ... Brother Strange who was there ... and anyone in the know ... will tell you, PP, that the AS was about first about the NB ... and holiness standards ....for good measure ...

the UC's wanted to sanitize the movement of divergent thought ....

With the PCIers removed ... the last battle regarding the AS is standards like TV .... You don't even SEE IT ... PP.

Exactly. We defend what we believe and agree with, don't we?

I wonder if Daniel would defend us to his AOG friends like he defends these guys?

I'm asking you to be more objective in your assessment ....