Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 

Wow! We are not talking about "them", but NW. Changing the focus of the debate is always a sign of lack of firm logical footing.

I'm glad our founders did not give up on the fight with the Brits just because they kept sending out more armies. They fought until the battle was won!! We are to endure hardness, as good soldiers, according to Paul.

I guess the bean patch is worth defending, but the UPC is worthy of abandonment? Great logic.

Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 

and with some of the consort hairstyles today, looking at them from a different angle does make them a totally different person. :)

Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 

UUUUmmmmmmm, you don't remember right. It was sent to a committee for study in 06.


:TulsaNO:

Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 

AFTER it had been voted AGAINST at GC.....

Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 

"Simon Says copy me when i say ummmmmm" LOL

Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 

So true. I, who would have voted against the resolution, did not vote to send it to committee. I wanted to defeat it right then. To say a "committee" vote was a vote against the resolution is not right. We can not get in the head of each preacher who voted (but boy would that be interesting)!

So, no, it was not voted against in Columbus.

Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 

NO. It was never brought to vote. California DS (at the time) asked to have it tabled and that is what happened. There was not a vote.

Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 

If your going to stomp around in your high heels saying, "UUUmmmmmm" at least know what your talking about.


:toofunny

Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 

A man who convinced many to leave Michigan and follow him to California.

Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 

connielori, George is right on this matter.

Both sides were in much angst over this decision.