![]() |
Re: I believe poor ole Roger...
Just wanted to post a quick update to this thread.
News Story today--> http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200....ap/index.html Now that the story broke in the media today, I can just add to this thread what I wanted to say before, but couldn't. THIS is why I never believed Roger: I have a contact in NY who is very close to the situation and told me this back in late December, but insisted that I not say a word to anyone. So, as hard as it was, I kept quiet about it. Now that it's come out, I'm able to speak freely. In a nutshell, according to my contact, Brian McNamee was asked by Roger Clemens about the possibility of getting some steroids from McNamee. BM mentioned the situation first to certain team officials in the organization, and according to him, he was told to go ahead, but be very discreet. So BM went ahead,but still had reservations about it, and so he decided to save the syringes as proof, as a bargaining chip just in case he ever got into trouble because of it. When the Mitchell Report came out in December, BM was content to keep the syringes and other physical evidence quiet. But Roger Clemens and his lawyers kept running their mouth, and even sued BM for defamation. BM's mind was made up that if Clemens & co. kept pushing the issue he'd go ahead and present the syringes as proof, since he's pretty sure they'll be able to test for and find Clemens' blood in the needle, as well as residual traces of steroids/HGH in the syringes. Not even the Feds knew he had the syringes all this time. All he gave them was his verbal testimony in the beginning. Apparently Clemens and his people have been blindsided by this news. Now it'll be interesting to see how Roger and his team responds to this. --- I'm not posting this to "bash" Roger Clemens per se. Just wanted to make the point that there was always more to this story than met the eye. |
Re: I believe poor ole Roger...
i am following it, not sure i 100% believe him.
|
Re: I believe poor ole Roger...
I personally do not believe it is fair - at all - to single out a few ball players when they are all competing against each other and are just about forced to use enhancement drugs to stay in the game.
None of them hold a candle to Babe Ruth - a fat, womanizing drunk that could out play them with one hand tied behind his back. He didn't need enhancement drugs. That's all! Carry on......... :happydance |
Re: I believe poor ole Roger...
Quote:
So, whether they're being "singled out" or not, I don't feel sorry of any of them that have now been exposed. |
Re: I believe poor ole Roger...
Quote:
We think of them as dishonest and probably for the most part, yes, but I see the dirty, ugly competitive side and I'm sorry it has to be that way or has been that way. I don't like that side of sports. I say they better make sure that every person involved is also indicted. Not just a few major players! JMHO |
Re: I believe poor ole Roger...
Quote:
As the saying goes... sometimes the cover-up is worse than the crime. |
Re: I believe poor ole Roger...
Quote:
It's just a big mess! The LOVE of money is the root of all evil. |
Re: I believe poor ole Roger...
Quote:
|
Re: I believe poor ole Roger...
Quote:
|
Re: I believe poor ole Roger...
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.