Apostolic Friends Forum - Answer to charges that Names were used without consent

Page 5 of 6

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Apostolic Friends Forum (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/index.php)

- WPF News (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=46)

- - Answer to charges that Names were used without consent (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/showthread.php?t=11846)

Bullwinkle

01-31-2008 03:02 PM

Re: Answer to charges that Names were used without

Quote:

Originally Posted by stmatthew (Post 374127)

No, my conclusion is that Bro Bernard never grasped what was being said to him. This was either due to the person posting to him not being clear, or his already having a preconceived view of everything. Either way, he drew some incorrect conclusions. The same thing that seems to be happening on many levels.

You don't suppose that he may have had some information from outside of the forum world?
Not everyone gets their information from the CAFeteria.

Thumper

01-31-2008 03:34 PM

Re: Answer to charges that Names were used without

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nograj (Post 374676)

Please forgive me, I know this is like two pages back, however I would like to know the names of all the men whom you know for a fact did not give consent to be on the WPF General Council.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thumper (Post 374883)

Don't hold your breathe. I have been asking this question on another forum for a while now and all I get is either silence or "Oh I gues I was mistaken"

Listed below are all the names of people used without consent.

I told you not to hold your breathe

I hope you are not still holding your breathe nograj

Nograj

02-03-2008 12:18 AM

Re: Answer to charges that Names were used without

*turning blue*

Thumper

02-03-2008 11:09 AM

Re: Answer to charges that Names were used without

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thumper (Post 374883)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nograj (Post 378225)

*turning blue*

Everybody seems to know somebody who knew somebody whose name was used without consent. Unfortunately, nobody seems to be able to come with an actual name that can be verified or denied.

LOL

Nograj

02-04-2008 12:12 AM

Re: Answer to charges that Names were used without

i guess we shut this topic down.lol

Thumper

02-04-2008 07:31 AM

Re: Answer to charges that Names were used without

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nograj (Post 378833)

i guess we shut this topic down.lol

It is all so pitiful isn't it Brother. :)

SecretWarrior

02-04-2008 07:36 AM

Re: Answer to charges that Names were used without

For one...I heard John Shoemake for one......

While he was listed.....Shoemake didn't even go to Tulsa....

Steve Epley

02-04-2008 09:16 AM

Re: Answer to charges that Names were used without

Quote:

Originally Posted by SecretWarrior (Post 378902)

For one...I heard John Shoemake for one......

While he was listed.....Shoemake didn't even go to Tulsa....

I heard-I think????????????????????? And this is proof? All this rukus and not a proven name on the list yet?

Before I get shot I did not go to Tulsa I am not going to join they are NOT conservative enough for me.

AGAPE

02-04-2008 09:38 AM

Re: Answer to charges that Names were used without

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley (Post 378950)

:stirpot

stmatthew

02-04-2008 10:11 AM

Re: Answer to charges that Names were used without

Quote:

Originally Posted by Steve Epley (Post 378950)

I heard-I think????????????????????? And this is proof? All this rukus and not a proven name on the list yet?

Before I get shot I did not go to Tulsa I am not going to join they are NOT conservative enough for me.

This is kinda funny. :toofunny

I think Tulsa is in between the UPCI and the AMF in its conservativism.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:51 PM.

Page 5 of 6

Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page