I agree...good post!

You are one more cheap shot artist.

I would respect your insults more if you left the smileys off.

That just makes you look worse.

If you are going to attack a man, at least have the backbone to do it without trying to make it look like a semi-jokewhen we all know it isn't, Mr. Executive Servant.

of course, it is much more appealing to insult a man who can't defend himself.

Especially if that man has handed your rear end to you a time or two in various debates.

But anyway, that is enough of this I guess.

WWOD is no candidate for beatification, but it rankles me a little to see him insulted by MOW.

It is the opinion of Admin that some of the discussion of the 'intelligence' or 'ignorance' of the past posters could border on questionable. Please use discretion in your statements as, while no longer with us, they should not be treated as enemies.

Thank you.

I thought MOW was no longer part of the Admin

Check the list above your post.

Thanks admin. Maybe now the psychoanalysis will stop from the armchair doctors. :drama

nah. The man was a great debater. He could be somewhat acidic, but always made his point.

Fine line?


Coonskinner
Resident Redneck Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 3,148

There is a saying among coon hunters regarding old hounds that have passed over the western slope--"The deader the better."

When the coffee and the stories get to flowing, and you start reminiscing about the greatness of old Sounder or old Queen, it's easy to forget about the nights they kept you out late running fox, or the possums they treed.

Our fondness for them has a way of editing the memories we have.

Dan is a smart guy and pretty glib.

But in just a few hours, he is suddenly becoming a theological genius that no one could stand against, a sort of liberal Rob Roy/William Wallace who vanquished all the evil, perpetually angry and theologically ignorant cons until they finally schemed a way to do him in.

I will miss Dan. We had some nice communications via PM's.

I wish him well.

But he is neither innocent, nor quite worthy of the mythical status he is attaining here.

I think [you] misses WWOD

From experience I personally think the "acidic" part is what does us in....the only people I ever see patting someone like that on the back are the ones already in his or her corner....What is the point in debating if not to show the other side both what we believe is biblical and that we can have our different views and still be Christ like? I never seen Trinitarians or Oneness be convinced by an acidic debater or a debater that is able to rile up his opponent with insults and pejoratives or for that matter consistantly misrepresenting what the other person believes over and over (like how they believe in three gods)...

And your problem with this post is...?

I have never heard S. C. Johnson debate. I did hear the Hicks-Ramsey debates as a young BC student.

This I can say....I don't miss Caston Smith :toofunny

Jekyll seems to be enamored of the "insert the posters name" option on every thread. :toofunny

It's the {you} thing!

:Nhl_crash

You are a nerd!!! I almost fell for this. Had to have my sweet hubby, who is now home from hunting, check it out on his computer.

:nahnah

I see a number of compliments to Dan in that post, and zero insults.

What is your point?

It's fun to catch someone off guard in an ultra serious thread

LOL! That's a good one! :happydance

:ouch
Duly deserved and accepted.



:toofunny:toofunny:toofunny

if {you} is abused by [you], BoredOutOfMyMind can turn it OFF!

I think The Mrs said around 237 have been on today.

:nahnah
:nahnah
:nahnah
:nahnah
:nahnah

Unique Members Today 234

New Posts Today 923

Yep, dead as sin.

Some think they will be heard if they say a lot, but many words do not equate to knowledge and a big vocabulary is not necessarily an indication of wisdom.

Awwww...a few well-placed you's never hurt anyone :shhh

New Users Today 5
New Threads Today 26

Yep, pretty dried up!

You have spoken a mouthful!

You said a lot without saying too much!

How wise.