Originally Posted by Barb (Post 368069)

My godsister in CA told me once that pjs are not taught against in her church, and her pastor is one of the Tulsa Six...

Pjs are just that...pajamas.

Originally Posted by Dora (Post 368012)

I wear PJ's all the time! Love 'em! So am I'm gonna split hell wide open or what?

Originally Posted by HeavenlyOne (Post 368067)

For consistency, you would also have to agree that women wearing pantyhose are also wearing pants.

Think about it. Just because they are sheer material doesn't mean it's ok. Pattern-wise, they are no different than the bottom half of pajamas with feet in them.

Originally Posted by revrandy (Post 368109)

We are fairly conservative....but my wife wears sweats...PJ's.....Bottoms & Tops....among other things :happydance to bed...I don't have any problems with it....cold....warm...or otherwise...

We should stay out of the Bedroom when it comes to this stuff!!

Originally Posted by rgcraig (Post 367817)

No, they are sleepwear just like underwear isn't pants.

What about a girdle? Do they not allow women to wear them - - they could be equated to shorts....tight shorts, but same silliness!

Originally Posted by pelathais (Post 367829)

The real test is scriptural. Do the pajamas in question "pertain" to a man or a woman? So, to answer our questioner we must submit an ardent "ultra-con" to the test and have him wear the pajama "pants" in question.

If the "ultra-con" is comfortable wearing the ladies' pajamas, then we indeed have a problem. If we can't even get the "ultra-con" to style the pj's for us- then it's a non-issue and the ladies are free to garb themselves as they see fit.

Originally Posted by Praxeas (Post 368143)

I wonder what women do in cold cold weather that believe like this. Wear pants or even long johns under the dress?

Originally Posted by Praxeas (Post 368143)

I wonder what women do in cold cold weather that believe like this. Wear pants or even long johns under the dress?