Apostolic Friends Forum
Page 79 of 83 « First 2969707172737475767778 79 80818283
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Apostolic Friends Forum (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/index.php)
-   WPF News (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=46)
-   -   Tulsa Report Day 2 (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/showthread.php?t=11829)

Nahum 01-29-2008 08:06 PM
Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by IAintMovin (Post 373383)
LOL...... I understand what you are saying there PP...........but in all honesty, Steddy was only reporting what was told to him.....a man cannot be responsible for another man telling him one thing and then doing something else.........reminds me of people who have told me that something was over and dead .......then I find out that they have been talking it all over the place.......man you just never know what somebody is gonna do.........Guess that is what I get for trusting their hearsay........ :D :D :D
My point is that it is probably not wise to trust someone (Tulsa organizers) who "changes" that much in such a short time.:TulsaNO:

IAintMovin 01-29-2008 08:07 PM
Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster (Post 373388)
My point is that it is probably not wise to trust someone (Tulsa organizers) who "changes" that much in such a short time.:TulsaNO:
I agree and my point was it is probably not wise to trust people who will tell you one thing and do another........ :D

Nahum 01-29-2008 08:09 PM
Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by IAintMovin (Post 373391)
I agree and my point was it is probably not wise to trust people who will tell you one thing and do another........ :D
OMG, we AGREE!!!!!!!!!!!:stretch:

MissBrattified 01-29-2008 08:09 PM
Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster (Post 373382)
Yes, but he defends those men and says that their intent must have "changed" over the past three months.
PP, you were belaboring this point a few days ago, and its still moot. It is highly possible that their intent did change, OR its possible they did not share their full intent at the beginning.

If your point is (as it seemed to be on your other thread) that trusting in these men, respecting them, and thinking they are honorable even when evidence may indicate otherwise somehow taints the character of the man who trusts them, then I am going to strongly disagree with you.

I have a hard time believing ill of people I love, even if there is clear evidence that ought to persuade me, and if it turns out that I am wrong, I will not accept it until the evidence is irrefutable. Even then I am not happy about it.

Any reluctance on the part of CS, Steadfast and others to think badly of any of these men, or worse, to indicate that publicly...that doesn't speak ill of their personal character; it speaks well of it.

Nahum 01-29-2008 08:11 PM
Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissBrattified (Post 373394)
PP, you were belaboring this point a few days ago, and its still moot. It is highly possible that their intent did change, OR its possible they did not share their full intent at the beginning.

If your point is (as it seemed to be on your other thread) that trusting in these men, respecting them, and thinking they are honorable even when evidence may indicate otherwise somehow taints the character of the man who trusts them, then I am going to strongly disagree with you.

I have a hard time believing ill of people I love, even if there is clear evidence that ought to persuade me, and if it turns out that I am wrong, I will not accept it until the evidence is irrefutable. Even then I am not happy about it.

Any reluctance on the part of CS, Steadfast and others to think badly of any of these men, or worse, to indicate that publicly...that doesn't speak ill of their personal character; it speaks well of it.


:TulsaROCKS:



Consistency Miss B.

Consistency.





That is all.

IAintMovin 01-29-2008 08:11 PM
Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster (Post 373392)
OMG, we AGREE!!!!!!!!!!!:stretch:
..........really??.....hummmmmmmm...........

Nahum 01-29-2008 08:12 PM
Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by IAintMovin (Post 373399)
..........really??.....hummmmmmmm...........
In related news, the sky is falling.

IAintMovin 01-29-2008 08:12 PM
Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissBrattified (Post 373394)
PP, you were belaboring this point a few days ago, and its still moot. It is highly possible that their intent did change, OR its possible they did not share their full intent at the beginning.

If your point is (as it seemed to be on your other thread) that trusting in these men, respecting them, and thinking they are honorable even when evidence may indicate otherwise somehow taints the character of the man who trusts them, then I am going to strongly disagree with you.

I have a hard time believing ill of people I love, even if there is clear evidence that ought to persuade me, and if it turns out that I am wrong, I will not accept it until the evidence is irrefutable. Even then I am not happy about it.

Any reluctance on the part of CS, Steadfast and others to think badly of any of these men, or worse, to indicate that publicly...that doesn't speak ill of their personal character; it speaks well of it.

Great Post Mrs. B................

freeatlast 01-29-2008 08:13 PM
Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by MissBrattified (Post 373394)
PP, you were belaboring this point a few days ago, and its still moot. It is highly possible that their intent did change, OR its possible they did not share their full intent at the beginning.

If your point is (as it seemed to be on your other thread) that trusting in these men, respecting them, and thinking they are honorable even when evidence may indicate otherwise somehow taints the character of the man who trusts them, then I am going to strongly disagree with you.

I have a hard time believing ill of people I love, even if there is clear evidence that ought to persuade me, and if it turns out that I am wrong, I will not accept it until the evidence is irrefutable. Even then I am not happy about it.

Any reluctance on the part of CS, Steadfast and others to think badly of any of these men, or worse, to indicate that publicly...that doesn't speak ill of their personal character; it speaks well of it.
Maam...you are hard to argue with...so I'll just say.....






















good post

MissBrattified 01-29-2008 08:14 PM
Re: Tulsa Report Day 2
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster (Post 373398)
:TulsaROCKS:



Consistency Miss B.

Consistency.





That is all.
I understand what you're saying. :)

But then, I am a little bit inconsistent in this way too. I will accept negative statements about a stranger (or about someone I don't like) a lot quicker than about someone I care about or admire. Human nature, I think.

Matter of fact, I've been known to defend people I care about even when I knew they were wrong, simply because I didn't want to hear them talked about.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:59 AM.
Page 79 of 83 « First 2969707172737475767778 79 80818283
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.