Apostolic Friends Forum

Apostolic Friends Forum (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/index.php)
-   Deep Waters (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   A "Forward" Glimpse Into The Future? (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/showthread.php?t=3482)

Nahum 05-09-2007 11:23 PM

A "Forward" Glimpse Into The Future?
 
This is a paragraph lifted from the special edition released two weeks ago. It was in the middle of the article titled "What effect will television ministry have on the Apostolic church"? It was presented by the tv resolution opponents.

"Adoption of such a resolution would divide our fellowship. While some proponents may feel adoption would have a positive effect, we must accept the fact that division would be inevitable. There might not be a mass exodus at first, but eventually alternatives would surface which would attract a substantial number of UPCI ministers."


Is this code for "hang on guys, we have an alternative in the oven"?

SoCaliUPC 05-09-2007 11:37 PM

Who wrote the article?

Nahum 05-09-2007 11:38 PM

None of the writers were allowed to identify themselves.

SoCaliUPC 05-09-2007 11:40 PM

So this was just one of many articles...or the main article?

Nahum 05-09-2007 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoCaliUPC (Post 107973)
So this was just one of many articles...or the main article?

Each side was given ten pages. This was a very small snippet lifted from one article. There were several articles presented from each side.

SoCaliUPC 05-09-2007 11:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster (Post 107975)
Each side was given ten pages. This was a very small snippet lifted from one article. There were several articles presented from each side.

Okay....cool.

I am all for presenting both sides in the same publication and given equal weight. Dialogue and discussion can not come from one stand. What I would love to do is hear a panel....equal for and against.

However, back to the article....wonder why they were not allowed to put a name behind the article.

Nahum 05-09-2007 11:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SoCaliUPC (Post 107978)
Okay....cool.

I am all for presenting both sides in the same publication and given equal weight. Dialogue and discussion can not come from one stand. What I would love to do is hear a panel....equal for and against.

However, back to the article....wonder why they were not allowed to put a name behind the article.

dunno

You could tell who wrote some of them though.

CC1 05-10-2007 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster (Post 107957)
This is a paragraph lifted from the special edition released two weeks ago. It was in the middle of the article titled "What effect will television ministry have on the Apostolic church"? It was presented by the tv resolution opponents.

"Adoption of such a resolution would divide our fellowship. While some proponents may feel adoption would have a positive effect, we must accept the fact that division would be inevitable. There might not be a mass exodus at first, but eventually alternatives would surface which would attract a substantial number of UPCI ministers."


Is this code for "hang on guys, we have an alternative in the oven"?

In my opinion that statement is there for several reasons. First it is factually accurate. Second, and most important, this is a pretty blunt warning that they are going to leave if it passes. I am sure this is intended to once again draw the moderates to their side in the vote under the banner of maintaining unity.

I noticed they did not say alternatives "could" sufrace but rather that alternatives "would" surface. Again I belive this is an intentional message.

crakjak 05-10-2007 12:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pastor Poster (Post 107957)
This is a paragraph lifted from the special edition released two weeks ago. It was in the middle of the article titled "What effect will television ministry have on the Apostolic church"? It was presented by the tv resolution opponents.Is this code for "hang on guys, we have an alternative in the oven"?

"Failure of such a resolution would divide our fellowship. While some opponents may feel that failure would have a positive effect, we must accept the fact that division would be inevitable. There might not be a mass exodus at first, but eventually alternatives would surface which would attract a substantial number of UPCI ministers."


I took license to change a couple of words in the quote, and it still is just as true, IMO, what about you?

btw what happened to your hair??

Nahum 05-10-2007 12:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crakjak (Post 107990)
"Failure of such a resolution would divide our fellowship. While some opponents may feel that failure would have a positive effect, we must accept the fact that division would be inevitable. There might not be a mass exodus at first, but eventually alternatives would surface which would attract a substantial number of UPCI ministers."


I took license to change a couple of words in the quote, and it still is just as true, IMO, what about you?

btw what happened to your hair??

It de parted.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:35 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.