![]() |
Suggestion
How about a name change since this has ceased to be Apostolic in any sense of the word?
Maybe Ex-Apostolic Friends Forum? |
Re: Suggestion
Hmm, I guess you're right. Perhaps we need to be paying homage to Rome. ;)
Apostolic: ap⋅os⋅tol⋅ic /ˌæpəˈstɒlɪk/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [ap-uh-stol-ik] Show IPA –adjective 1. of or characteristic of an apostle. 2. pertaining to or characteristic of the 12 apostles. 3. derived from the apostles in regular succession. 4. of or pertaining to the pope; papal. Main Entry: ap·os·tol·ic Pronunciation: \ˌa-pə-ˈstä-lik\ Function: adjective Date: 13th century 1 a: of or relating to an apostle b: of, relating to, or conforming to the teachings of the New Testament apostles 2 a: of or relating to a succession of spiritual authority from the apostles held (as by Roman Catholics, Anglicans, and Eastern Orthodox) to be perpetuated by successive ordinations of bishops and to be necessary for valid sacraments and orders b: papal |
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Bro Epley, there certainly has been an emergence away from and into something different than the old FCF days.
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
If "Apostolic" refers to those who stick to the NT for their doctrines, people who believe in one, true God, baptize in Jesus' name, and believe in being filled with the Holy Ghost, the gifts of the spirit, etc., then I'd say there are a LOT of Apostolics on this forum. That doesn't mean they get the most airtime, but I think they're adequately represented--enough to call this the "Apostolic Friends Forum."
Now, if you only define Apostolic by those who hold to certain standards of dress--well, then you do have a problem. I think Apostolic is based on core doctrines regarding the identity of God and what constitutes salvation. Not sleeve length or whether someone wears open-toed shoes. I do believe that Apostolic encompasses conservatism, in that we should interpret scriptures conservatively--as close to the original meaning as possible, without broad interpretations and expansion. A simple, face value approach. |
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Seems dissing of standards is quite doctrinal around here.
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
And then there are others who take the plunge into forum discussion judiciously. :) I think a few others have taken a holiday like TR France. |
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
Quote:
Granted, that saying is usually brought up when talking about file sharing. |
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
:) :) :) :) :) |
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
Interesting reading in threads around January to February 2008. |
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Thank you for narrowing the broad brush to forum members. :)
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Y'all want to turn this into a lib verses con thing and I am NOT going to let you.
Some subjects defended on this forum: All shades of Calvinism Universalism Faith Only Silent Baptism the One necessity of speaking in tongues sprinkling as baptism that's just for a start off the top of my head. Do you go to an Apostolic church that baptizes by immersion in Jesus Name & does your church preach & practice recieving the HGB evidenced by sepaking in tongues? |
Re: Suggestion
I do believe this place has changed.
The coversations are stale. That, and the constant jabs at Christianity, authority, submission and Pentecostalism get very, very old. AFF has turned into an instant messaging tool where people talk about silly, inconsequential, feminine things instead of the religious site it was intended to be. The level of intelligent discourse has descended into the abyss. All of this is not to say I don't enjoy a good laugh. But when the entire premise of the forum is utter idiocy, and every substantial thread ends in either extramarital flirting and/or atheistic and/or agnostic posters tearing down Christianity as a whole, I think the original purpose of this forum is perverted. I love the owners and admin here, but the site is failing. That's why I rarely post. And friends, I am nowhere close to an ultracon. |
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
Hmmm. The uncloistered and cloistered, eh? How about the Egyptians and Hebrews. Or the faith non-contending and contending. You have your analogy. :) |
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
There is one!:thumbsup:thumbsup |
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
|
Re: Suggestion
I agree there seems to be a lot of departure from apostolic doctrine. I am apostolic all the way! :D
We are currently making a video series for online viewing of LT Smith's "Rightly Dividing The Word" 2-day bible study which lays out apostolic doctrine in detail from the scriptures. Will tell you when it is out. |
Re: Suggestion
Quote:
Me. I do. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:37 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.