Apostolic Friends Forum

Apostolic Friends Forum (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/index.php)
-   Fellowship Hall (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/forumdisplay.php?f=7)
-   -   Esther (https://www.apostolicfriendsforum.com/showthread.php?t=34079)

Esther 02-27-2011 02:33 PM

Esther
 
Two questions for you bible scholars.

1. When Vashti was ordered to appear before the King with her crown, do you believe that meant without her veil OR that she was to wear her crown ONLY?

2. What do you know about the purification process, what all did that entail?

Thanks for your response.

Esther 02-27-2011 10:58 PM

Re: Esther
 
No one knows?

My research has brought different answers, from her not wearing a veil to wearing her crown only.

Also, seems the purification process may differ somewhat.

Anyone ever study this out?

Pressing-On 02-28-2011 10:41 AM

Re: Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Esther (Post 1037501)
Two questions for you bible scholars.

1. When Vashti was ordered to appear before the King with her crown, do you believe that meant without her veil OR that she was to wear her crown ONLY?

2. What do you know about the purification process, what all did that entail?

Thanks for your response.

Vashti's crown - I only read that it was simply a crown, but read nothing about a veil. Adam Clark says that the Targum/Aramaic translation adds that she was naked.

Adam Clark commentary on purification:

Let their things for purification be given them - תמרקיהן tamrukeyhen, their cosmetics. What these were we are told in Est_2:12; oil of myrrh, and sweet odours. The myrrh was employed for six months, and the odours for six months more, after which the person was brought to the king. This space was sufficient to show whether the young woman had been chaste; whether she were with child or not, that the king might not be imposed on, and be obliged to father a spurious offspring, which might have been the case had not this precaution been used.
Instead of the oil or myrrh, the Targum says it was the oil of unripe olives which caused the hair to fall off, and rendered the skin delicate.

Esther 02-28-2011 01:45 PM

Re: Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On (Post 1037816)
Vashti's crown - I only read that it was simply a crown, but read nothing about a veil. Adam Clark says that the Targum/Aramaic translation adds that she was naked.

Adam Clark commentary on purification:

Let their things for purification be given them - תמרקיהן tamrukeyhen, their cosmetics. What these were we are told in Est_2:12; oil of myrrh, and sweet odours. The myrrh was employed for six months, and the odours for six months more, after which the person was brought to the king. This space was sufficient to show whether the young woman had been chaste; whether she were with child or not, that the king might not be imposed on, and be obliged to father a spurious offspring, which might have been the case had not this precaution been used.
Instead of the oil or myrrh, the Targum says it was the oil of unripe olives which caused the hair to fall off, and rendered the skin delicate.


Yes I saw that same information.

I also read somewhere, can't remember off the top of my head, where the oil, and I think it was the maybe the olive oil would remove all hair. And the oil of myrrh and frankincense would remove body odors from foods that some of the "poorer" girls may have consummed.

It was either Matthew Henry or Adams can't remember which that stated she was asked to appear without her veil. Now times where different then than now but I can't see where that would have been enough of an issue to keep her from coming before the King, knowing that disobeying a king could mean death.

I am leaning toward she was requested to be naked.

What do you think?

Pressing-On 02-28-2011 02:06 PM

Re: Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Esther (Post 1037947)
Yes I saw that same information.

I also read somewhere, can't remember off the top of my head, where the oil, and I think it was the maybe the olive oil would remove all hair. And the oil of myrrh and frankincense would remove body odors from foods that some of the "poorer" girls may have consummed.

It was either Matthew Henry or Adams can't remember which that stated she was asked to appear without her veil. Now times where different then than now but I can't see where that would have been enough of an issue to keep her from coming before the King, knowing that disobeying a king could mean death.

I am leaning toward she was requested to be naked.

What do you think?

I've always heard she was requested to be naked.

Barnes commentary says this:

Est 1:11
To bring Vashti the queen - This command, though contrary to Persian customs, is not out of harmony with the character of Xerxes; and is evidently related as something strange and unusual. Otherwise, the queen would not have refused to come.

And Gill:

to show the people and the princes her beauty; for she was fair to look upon; which was not wisely done, neither was it comely nor safe.

Not safe because she was naked and they were drunk or just because they were drunk?

Pressing-On 02-28-2011 02:20 PM

Re: Esther
 
This may simply be the reason, although, it doesn't exclude her possibly being requested to appear naked.

From Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible, Volume II, page 2122:

According to Plutarch, Persian custom dictated that the kings would ordinarily eat with their legitimate wives, but when they wanted to "riot and drink", they would send their wives away and call in their concubines."

Being that Vashti sponsored a banquet for the women, and that she was requested to appear with her "royal crown", and refused to come shows that she was a person of importance.

So, I'm thinking he was drunk, went against propriety, would have embarrassed them both and greatly offended her.

Esther 02-28-2011 02:40 PM

Re: Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On (Post 1037970)
This may simply be the reason, although, it doesn't exclude her possibly being requested to appear naked.

From Baker Encyclopedia of the Bible, Volume II, page 2122:

According to Plutarch, Persian custom dictated that the kings would ordinarily eat with their legitimate wives, but when they wanted to "riot and drink", they would send their wives away and call in their concubines."

Being that Vashti sponsored a banquet for the women, and that she was requested to appear with her "royal crown", and refused to come shows that she was a person of importance.

So, I'm thinking he was drunk, went against propriety, would have embarrassed them both and greatly offended her.

I had never heard the "thought" that she was requested to appear naked until I heard Sis. Vesta Mangun mention it in a message she preached many years ago. I just discovered it this week when I was doing research on it.

And you are right, it was an event that wives were not admitted too.

Pressing-On 02-28-2011 03:03 PM

Re: Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Esther (Post 1037984)
I had never heard the "thought" that she was requested to appear naked until I heard Sis. Vesta Mangun mention it in a message she preached many years ago. I just discovered it this week when I was doing research on it.

And you are right, it was an event that wives were not admitted too.

I can't remember how long ago it was that I heard that she was requested to appear naked. Well, the commentators are saying it's in the Aramaic translation.

The only thing is that, from what I've studied, the Targum reflected "midrashic" interpretation, which means - Midrash is a way of interpreting biblical stories that goes beyond simple distillation of religious, legal or moral teachings. It fills in many gaps left in the biblical narrative regarding events and personalities that are only hinted at.

So, I'm not sure we could be conclusive about it.

I think, if I had to, I would go with Baker's take - that he would have offended her by inviting her like a common concubine.

Esther 02-28-2011 03:06 PM

Re: Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On (Post 1037995)
I can't remember how long ago it was that I heard that she was requested to appear naked. Well, the commentators are saying it's in the Aramaic translation.

The only thing is that, from what I've studied, the Targum reflected "midrashic" interpretation, which means - Midrash is a way of interpreting biblical stories that goes beyond simple distillation of religious, legal or moral teachings. It fills in many gaps left in the biblical narrative regarding events and personalities that are only hinted at.

So, I'm not sure we could be conclusive about it.

I think, if I had to, I would go with Baker's take - that he would have offended her by inviting her like a common concubine.

I am not that familiar with the Targum and wondered how acturate it is???

Pressing-On 02-28-2011 03:15 PM

Re: Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Esther (Post 1037998)
I am not that familiar with the Targum and wondered how acturate it is???

I don't really know.

BeenThinkin 02-28-2011 03:18 PM

Re: Esther
 
Esther, Just curious, but you're not contemplating appearing before "a King" are you? Just wondering' :heeheehee

Been Thinkin

Pressing-On 02-28-2011 06:27 PM

Re: Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BeenThinkin (Post 1038006)
Esther, Just curious, but you're not contemplating appearing before "a King" are you? Just wondering' :heeheehee

Been Thinkin

:toofunny

So that is why she is asking about the crown and the veil? She thought she might could make use of that veil? :toofunny

Pressing-On 02-28-2011 06:29 PM

Re: Esther
 
Esther,
I found this in Rabbinical Literature, which I'm sure isn't all that accurate.

Quote:

Vashti was justly punished for enslaving young Jewish women and compelling them to work nude on the Sabbath (ib.).E. C. J.

Read more: http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/vi...#ixzz1FIrN6QcG
Quote:

Vashti: (4th century BCE) Great-granddaughter of Nebuchadnezzar, wife of Ahasuerus. Took pleasure in tormenting Jewish girls. Was executed for refusing to obey her husband's command to appear at his party.

http://www.chabad.org/search/keyword...ish/Vashti.htm
Wondering if that is where the concept of her being requested to be naked came in? I don't know. Just a thought.

Sam 02-28-2011 06:30 PM

Re: Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Esther (Post 1037998)
I am not that familiar with the Targum and wondered how acturate it is???

The Targums or Targumim were used after the Hebrew language became unfamiliar to the Jews. The Scriptures would be read in Hebrew and then would be paraphrased in Aramaic. The word Targum means translation or interpretation. The paraphrase had to be memorized, it could not be written down. Later, the Targumim were allowed to be written down and there are a couple of them available (translated into English) online.

Since they were a paraphrase they were not a translation but an interpretation of the Hebrew and in time more and more traditions, opinions, legends, etc. found their way into them.

As an example, you can read the first 6 chapters of Genesis in the two main targumim at http://targum.info/pj/pjgen1-6.htm
Just compare what is there to current translations (NKJV or NASB or JPS) and you can see that there is some extra stuff in there and how accurate they are.

Esther 03-01-2011 04:17 PM

Re: Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BeenThinkin (Post 1038006)
Esther, Just curious, but you're not contemplating appearing before "a King" are you? Just wondering' :heeheehee

Been Thinkin

:heeheehee Might :happydance

Esther 03-01-2011 04:18 PM

Re: Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On (Post 1038095)
Esther,
I found this in Rabbinical Literature, which I'm sure isn't all that accurate.





Wondering if that is where the concept of her being requested to be naked came in? I don't know. Just a thought.

I agree with you I doubt this is accurate at all.

houston 03-01-2011 06:07 PM

Re: Esther
 
que cochineras

Pressing-On 03-01-2011 06:22 PM

Re: Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Esther (Post 1038693)
:heeheehee Might :happydance

:toofunny :toofunny

Esther 03-01-2011 07:36 PM

Re: Esther
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pressing-On (Post 1038801)
:toofunny :toofunny

I'm working on a crown now. :highfive


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.