![]() |
Prophesying Versus Speaking In Tongues
I found this study that I have been involving myself in to be very interesting... A discussion in another thread sent me studying the Word again and it never ceases to amaze what will come out of the word when it is opened.
This is OT.... The Spirit rested upon them... and they prophesied. Quote:
Quote:
Joel said... I will pour out my spirit upon all flesh... and they shall... among other things... prophesy. Peter recalls this scripture stating that THIS IS THAT. What happened on the day of Pentecost... was what this scripture was speaking. These are the things that will happen... Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
What does a prophesy look like? It speaks of the wonderful works of God and that is exactly what happened on the day of Pentecost. It happened in each of their languages so they could all hear it and understand it. Peter was saying... Joel said your sons & daughters will prophesy... and this is that. But when we see the scripture below we nearly ignore the word prophesy. All we see is tongues. Of the 12 people did speak in tongues. But people did also prophesy because prophesying when the spirit of the Lord comes upon you is a long established sign even from OT times. What would we think if the following verse said... "And the same man had four daughters, virgins, which did speak in tongues."? We'd think it was speaking of their actual conversion most likely. But we don't think about this possibly being their conversion because it says they prophesied even though prophecy is a well established sign of the infilling of the Holy Spirit. Quote:
|
Re: Prophesying Versus Speaking In Tongues
Numbers 11
28And Joshua the son of Nun, the servant of Moses, one of his young men, answered and said, My lord Moses, forbid them. 29And Moses said unto him, Enviest thou for my sake? would God that all the LORD'S people were prophets, and that the LORD would put his spirit upon them! 1 cor 14:5 I would that ye all spake with tongues but rather that ye prophesied: for greater is he that prophesieth than he that speaketh with tongues, except he interpret, that the church may receive edifying Acts 19:6 And when Paul had laid his hands upon them, the Holy Ghost came on them; and they spake with tongues, and prophesied So which is the initial evidence, Prophesying or tongues? |
Re: Prophesying Versus Speaking In Tongues
Tongues is uniquely common to references to any evidence of Spirit baptism. And since Spirit Baptism is a huge issue, that is why tongues is emphasized more than prophesying.
|
Re: Prophesying Versus Speaking In Tongues
Quote:
|
Re: Prophesying Versus Speaking In Tongues
Quote:
What about this scripture? Quote:
|
Re: Prophesying Versus Speaking In Tongues
Quote:
|
Re: Prophesying Versus Speaking In Tongues
mf in acts 2 the first time they spoke in tongues they were telling of the good works..they were not praising....
|
Re: Prophesying Versus Speaking In Tongues
Quote:
|
Re: Prophesying Versus Speaking In Tongues
Quote:
The only place tongues is mentioned and it is not specifically noted that a bystander understood in in Acts 19, and again prophesy is mentioned there, and prophecy is understood. I think tongues are not UNKNOWN languages, but UNLEARNED LANGUAGES-real langueas, not babbling. As far as tongues of "angels" that most likely doesn't mean some strange noise, when angels spoke to men, they spoke languages the men understood. My Bible is missing the scripture where the heavenly visitor spoke ANGELESE. |
Re: Prophesying Versus Speaking In Tongues
GREAT THREAD D4T. :thumbsup
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.