![]() |
Young's Analytical Concordance.
Has anybody here ever used a Young's Analytical concordance ?
I found one very cheap online,and I understand it is better than The Strong's. |
Re: Young's Analytical Concordance.
Don't waste money on those. Save up for Logos Library or some other digital library containing a real lexicon like the BDAG or something
Try Original Language for now then upgrade or add to it http://www.logos.com/basepackages?ut...1_basepackages |
Re: Young's Analytical Concordance.
the 300 dollar one is not bad
http://www.biblesoft.com/new/ |
Re: Young's Analytical Concordance.
bible works is good but probably a lot of stuff you'll never use
|
Re: Young's Analytical Concordance.
Youngs used to be well spoken of. I guess there is so much available nowadays it almost makes what used to to "cutting edge" seem like nothing. I remember it was pretty much Strongs or Youngs.
Only thing with Youngs it does not have as many of the words listed as Strongs. I still use them both. |
Re: Young's Analytical Concordance.
Quote:
Strongs claim to fame was his numbering system. He never actually discussed much as far as greek and Hebrew words. What he did was list how these words are translated in the KJV Thayers was more of a lexicon. Strongs was more of a concordance |
Re: Young's Analytical Concordance.
Years ago it used to be said about concordances:
Crudens for the crude Youngs for the young and Strongs for the strong. I have a Crudens but never use it. It's one volume of a 4 volume set of books from Zondervan. I don't have a Youngs so I can't really say anything about it. I have a Strongs and that's the one I use all the time. Actually, I think any Bible dictionaries, concordances, commentaries, etc are available for online access and are probably part of software packages which could be purchased and downloaded to your computer. |
Re: Young's Analytical Concordance.
Might as well just download Esword
|
Re: Young's Analytical Concordance.
Quote:
I don't know if Esword is compatible with it. |
Re: Young's Analytical Concordance.
How can you beat the Bible engines out there now? My understanding is that even the newer Strong's is somewhat corrupted? I thinkn vast cross ref, and a little more digging, available on several sites, biblecc, etc., just multiplexed out. 50 buttons on the page for study? It's led me to several Revs.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:05 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.