Quote:
Originally Posted by triumphant1
The issue is not one of judging.
A PUBLIC condemnation took place by RM.
A PUBLIC inconsistency took place one week ltaer in RM's church.
A PUBLIC examination of that inconsistency took place in two discussion forums where things are discussed.
The fact of the matter to me is that RM participates here. He has had plenty of opportunity to join in the discussion seeing this discussion is PUBLIC.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by notofworks
Hogwash. AI brought it up on its pages. It already was public. How does that not make sense??
|
The bold, above, is what doesn't make sense to me, NOW.
TI talks about two messages preached at RM's church AND then he says, word to effect - "And we are now discussing this on a couple of Internet forums. I don't know why RM doesn't want to participate in that? Come on big guy. We don't like what you did at YOUR church and we want you to answer to US, although, (clearing throat) we don't have anything to do with your church, personally. But, I am a friend on your Facebook page.
" LOL! Puleeeze!