View Single Post
  #18  
Old 04-18-2011, 07:54 PM
Aquila Aquila is offline
Banned


 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 31,124
Re: The necessity of Matt 28:19 & 1 John 5:7

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam View Post
Here is a trinitarian's explanation of a "person." This is taken from Bro. Dan Segrave's blog at http://danielsegraves.blogspot.com/2...1_archive.html


Alister E. McGrath’s simplified answer to the question, “How can God be three persons and one person at the same time?” may be helpful.

The word ‘person’ has changed its meaning since the third century when it began to be used in connection with the ‘threefoldness of God’. When we talk about God as a person, we naturally think of God as being one person. But theologians such as Tertullian, writing in the third century, used the word ‘person’ with a different meaning. The word ‘person’ originally derives from the Latin word persona, meaning an actor’s face-mask—and, by extension, the role which he takes in a play.

By stating that there were three persons but only one God, Tertullian was asserting that all three major roles in the great drama of human redemption are played by the one and the same God. The three great roles in this drama are all played by the same actor: God. Each of these roles may reveal God in a somewhat different way, but it is the same God in every case. So when we talk about God as one person, we mean one person in the modern sense of the word, and when we talk about God as three persons, we mean three persons in the ancient sense of the word. . . . Confusing these two senses of the word ‘person’ inevitably leads to the idea that God is actually a committee . . . .
Great points. That's why I always try to use the term persona along with person.

The main difference between Modalism and Trinitarianism is that Modalism believes that God is one person who manifests in three personas at various points in time. In Trinitarianism the three personas of God are eternal personas that eternally co-exist within in His nature.
Reply With Quote