Thread: Obama and Israel's pre-1967 Borders
View Single Post
  #7  
Old 05-19-2011, 03:48 PM
Hoovie's Avatar
Hoovie Hoovie is offline
Supercalifragilisticexpiali...


  
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 19,197
Re: Obama and Israel's pre-1967 Borders
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson View Post
Question 1:

I agree with the sentiments of the first three points, but the fourth point is not just a dramatic departure from America's past position regarding Jerusalem, it's just plain foolish of him to make that stand on behalf of America when he should know (by default or by advisors) that America as a whole recognize Jerusalem as belonging to Israel.


Point # 4 really makes me angry.


Question 2:

No, I don't think it's applicable as Israel's land had already been parted out long before this event. Biblical Israel is bigger than modern Israel.


I am really disgusted by our President's stance concerning number 4.
I agree. I am sure the pundits will say he mentioned something about mutual trading of certain areas... but still, just saying this is going to backfire on Obama. He will now be seen as solidly antiIsrael, IMO.
__________________
"It is inhumane, in my opinion, to force people who have a genuine medical need for coffee to wait in line behind people who apparently view it as some kind of recreational activity." Dave Barry 2005

I am a firm believer in the Old Paths

Articles on such subjects as "The New Birth," will be accepted, whether they teach that the new birth takes place before baptism in water and Spirit, or that the new birth consists of baptism of water and Spirit. - THE PENTECOSTAL HERALD Dec. 1945

"It is doubtful if any Trinitarian Pentecostals have ever professed to believe in three gods, and Oneness Pentecostals should not claim that they do." - Daniel Segraves
Reply With Quote