Quote:
Originally Posted by SoCaliUPC
Okay....cool.
I am all for presenting both sides in the same publication and given equal weight. Dialogue and discussion can not come from one stand. What I would love to do is hear a panel....equal for and against.
However, back to the article....wonder why they were not allowed to put a name behind the article.
|
The main reason no names were used is because the articles were actually somewhat of a "conglomeration" of opinions and/or research put forth by the various members of the committee. Each side had a "recording secretary" who gathered information and assembled it into articles. Thus, no one person could be said to have been the author.
That's the way I understand it. My brother-in-law is actually on the committee, and that's the way he explained it to me.