Quote:
Originally Posted by Kansas Preacher
The main reason no names were used is because the articles were actually somewhat of a "conglomeration" of opinions and/or research put forth by the various members of the committee. Each side had a "recording secretary" who gathered information and assembled it into articles. Thus, no one person could be said to have been the author.
That's the way I understand it. My brother-in-law is actually on the committee, and that's the way he explained it to me.
|
I admit my bias, but I was embarrased for the anti-resoultion camp.
Itwas all doomsday emotional rantings. The idea that they had to use a Charasmatic and an interview from years and years ago spoke volumes regarding how out of touch they really are.