Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
Paul was not a male chauvinist. He was a Hebrew, a Jew, who lived in the first century.
It was cultural that women wore veils long before Paul was born.
He was no more a male chauvinist for using "Father" instead of "Creator" than Jesus was or Peter
God Himself identified Himself as Father!
2Sa 7:14 I will be to him a father, and he shall be to me a son. When he commits iniquity, I will discipline him with the rod of men, with the stripes of the sons of men,
All Jews considered God their "Father". ALL Jews did. Male or Female. They did not have personal issues over it like you do or today's psychologically weak generation.
You aren't helping anyone by bowing to a small shrill minority that hate God
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Praxeas
I didn't confuse a topic. Don't brush off my answer
and pretend I did not answer you
No that is NOT a separate issue. THAT is the topic.
I addresses why Paul said that about women. You dijdn't like it for some reason
|
you can't have it both ways. you said the bible was the inspired word of God then you said Paul was a first century jew and that wearing veils was cultural before paul. so which is it inspired or cultural?
you did not address women keeping silent in the churches and not having authority over men. check your posts. i just did. is that inspired or chauvinistic cultural context? if not was it the correct hermeneutics?