05-29-2007, 04:47 PM
|
|
|
I think that there are times when lines are blurred between personal convictions and corporate standards. A person may not have a conviction that is taught by their organization or vice versa.
Some standards don't apply to some people. I for instance am a low maintenance woman. Make up and jewelry are not issues for me. So telling me not to wear make up or jewelry isn't going to ruffle my feathers. It’s a relief. On the other hand not wearing make up or jewelry doesn't make me feel closer to the Lord. I makes me feel like I have extra time to focus on things that are more important to me.
I think one obvious drawback to corporate standards is that people who don't conform (where they have no convictions) are limited in their church participation. On the other hand people that obey corporate standards have more access to ministry positions. People could be obeying standards for the wrong reasons.
I don't believe that all standards are salvational. I do believe that we are commanded to keep ourselves unspotted from the world. I also believe that if you are a friend of the world you are an enemy of God.
I don't judge people by their convictions. If a person has different convictions or no convictions that is none of my business. None of us are in heaven yet. I pray that I never become so sanctimonious and Pharisaic that I can't enjoy the fellowship of people that aren't exactly like me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RevDWW
Are the lines blurred between personal convictions and the "Standards" of the Corporate Body of the UPC and other organizations?
What do you see as the benefits and/or drawbacks to both?
Are "Standards" salvational? All of them? Some of them? Which ones?
Should we judge others if they don't meet with our personal convictions?
Any scripture to shed light on this subject?
|
|