[Originalist]

Originally Posted by Esaias

Did Deacon find out from the horse' mouth that his friend had wanted to meet him to express a concern for his soul? Or was that just hearsay from some tale-bearer?

Sounds to me that - based on what Deacon posted here - Deacon just ASSUMED his old friend was out to 'judge' him, and 'condemn' him, and rant and rave against all Deacon's backsliding worldliness blah blah blah.

Never mind the following facts:

1. Someone who expresses concern over another person's walk with God, enough to speak to them and talk to them and ask them questions and pray for them etc, is apparently a legalistic (backslidden? unsaved?) condemning Pharisee bogey-man type. YET,

2. Someone who feels another is backslidden and lost and does nothing but avoid them and say nothing is ALSO considered mean, unkind, unloving, judgmental, confused, twisted, wrong, spiritually abusive, blah blah blah. THEREFORE, it seems that -

3. The only people genuinely right with God are people who don't care about others' walk with the Lord, who never confront to the person what they believe is error, and who instead just talk about others' behind their backs (online) making sly judgments and insinuations about their spiritual health.

Unless it is a 'conservative type' doing those things, then of course it's just bad bad bad, because we all know that Christians who believe things like Hollywood entertainment and jewelry and makeup and women dressing like men and wearing makeup or dressing like ho's or men being effeminate or whatever it may be is wrong are just bad bad bad to begin with, no matter what they do, bless their little hearts.

If you had received that warning phone call from a trusted friend, would you have rebuked him for tale bearing?