Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Pitta
The problem with the majority text is that it does not account for the transmission of the text. Some variant readings can be dated.
Most manuscripts were created in a certain time period. The majority text ignores the importance of the age of a manuscript.
Geography also comes into play. Yet this is also dismissed by the majority text.
A majority text ignores all aspects of a manuscript and counts all manuscripts as if they are identical.
|
Yes! The Word of God has to be identical. In the time of 1700 rears one text agrees with an other.
But the minority are contradict one with the other. Even if one or two of them are considered older from the majority this dont means nothing.Because if "the older is the best" then why the two oldest texts contradict one the other?
Anyway i have also "Alford, Westcott - Hort and Critical text but i dont give them the same trust as the original text.
God bless.