View Single Post
  #32  
Old 03-27-2018, 11:21 AM
Strict Baptist Strict Baptist is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Posts: 100
Re: A Waldensian chimes in

Quote:
Originally Posted by Esaias View Post
Interesting.

Anyway, I notice you say you do not debate in print/text. That seems rather strange, since you would have a copy of the debate so would have an unedited copy to publish far and wide. An audio or video recording of a debate could likewise be edited, to the same lack of avail since you would, again, have an unedited copy. Not sure why one would desire to debate with someone they suspect would edit a copy of the debate, though. If I thought someone was going to do that I would realise they are wholly dishonest and discussion/debate would be pointless, in any format, except perhaps to inform others to avoid such a one.
I simply do not debate in print unless it is to be published as a book. I don't trust that those who would, and in that event should be avoided as antichrist, handle my words with all superfluity of naughtiness and cunning craftiness. I prefer video or audio so a file can be kept in my archive like Talking with a Waldensian done with Afshin Yaghtin who lied again and again in his discussion with me. Video also affords luxuries text does not.
__________________
Psalm 60-3, 100.4-5, 115.1-3, 130.4-5, 146 Authorized & Darby Versions. Host, Strict & Particular Baptist Radio

See the 1689 Second London Baptist Confession, 1693 (Keach's) Catechism as well as Gadsby's Catechism for the summation of my doctrinal beliefs; I do not maintain filiation and spiration. I emphatically hold to all Five Solas also the Scriptural Law of Worship.

Gmchristianbooks.com
Reply With Quote