Quote:
Originally Posted by Originalist
As for the second question, no. But I find the question to be a cheap attempt at disqualifying someone from a debate. I could just as easily disqualify any "marriage permanence" promoter that is divorced and remaining single. The doctrine being espoused rises and falls on its own merits, regardless of the marital status or background of the one opposing or condoning it.
|
When you have pastors who are officiating at second and third "marriage" adulterous "weddings", and then reap the tithes and offerings benefit, and various thanks and accolades, it is clearly a difficult thing for them to really look at the issues scripturally.
This does not disqualify them from the discussion, but is worthwhile to be noted.