Quote:
Originally Posted by tbpew
Rico,
thanks for taking the time to reply.
My focus point was that the scripture does not admonish the other prophet to go to 1st prophet in private.
If that were God's remedy, the real "losers" would be those that heard the 1st without the benefit of the 2nd who "had a thing revealed to him".
We seem to be in agreement that this section of scripture is NOT in operation in our assemblies. I was submitting that a "post-event" to a 1st prophetic utterence impacting another person (who would be used in prophetic utterences) gains some benefit within the limitations of an internet discussioin board.
It is a means for a "similar edification or correction or 'additional revealing' to be shared publically since the scriptural setting is not generally encouraged and/or manifested among groups of men who gather together.
|
Brother, if prophets are subject to other prophets then doesn't it stand to reason that one prophet should go to the other prophet if he feels that the other is in error? Why is it ok for a prophet to come on a website and give enough information away concerning another prophet so others will be able to figure who it is he's talking about, when sharing his feeling about what was said? How can this be justified in light of what the scripture says about prophets being subject to each other? The appropriate course of action would have been to go directly to the prophet with his concerns, in my opinion.
BTW, yes, we are in agreement that things aren't practiced the way the scripture says they should.