07-27-2007, 02:31 PM
|
 |
Not riding the train
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,544
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timmy
In the women/pants/hell thread, SE gave this explanation of why certain abominations in the OT are still bad today, and some are now OK:
This could cover the things mentioned as abominations (if it's correct), but what about the other laws? Not every forbidden thing is called an abomination, either to "you" or to "God". The Ten Commandments, for example, and "take no gift" ( Exodus 23:8).
And is this way of classifying abominations a commonly held view of Apostolics? I have seen only SE espouse the idea, I think.
Any thoughts? |
Deut 22:5 DOES NOT cover unisex clothing. It covers the abomination of homosexuality. Period. 
|