View Single Post
  #38  
Old 10-03-2007, 11:38 AM
Rev Dooley
Guest


 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by JTULLOCK View Post
Because in theory it was to Unite the fellowship, but it divided the group. OR Maybe that was the point was to weed out the progressive ones. I believe that there would be alot more members in the Fellowship/Organization if the blasted, infernal thing never came up. IMO
While this was not addressed to me personally, I would like to comment on the bolded part above.

Why is it that so many think that bigger is better? If the org were bigger, why do you seem to think that would be better?

American thinking like this is absurd and has caused multitudes of problems for so many people. If we had a larger government, would that be better? More taxes to support it? (Dues were raised not so long ago.)
More people to man the posts. (Again, more money needed to do what is already being done.)
More money being siphoned off of missionary funding to support overly lavish lifestyles here at home. (Seems to me that that money could be better utilised supporting missonaries instead of buying someone here a new car or house.)
There are I am sure more things that could be listed than these.

Bigger is not always better. It only means that someone else is going to get the money that others so desparately need.
JMHO
Reply With Quote