Quote:
Originally Posted by Coonskinner
I repeated what I had heard from a friend who had spoken to one of the original six.
It has been my understanding that this thing evolved somewhat from the original plans, which were the plans I first heard about.
It is entirely possible that my understanding of what I heard was flawed, or that there was some miscommunication involved between when the words were spoken and when I heard them.
I might be naive. I am admittedly biased in favor of men I love and respect and who have been a blessing to me.
But to say my appreciation for them, and my choice to believe what they say is an integrity issue for me?
I am not really following you there.
|
I am saying some of these men claimed they were not going to do the exact thing they are currently doing. They made these claims while planning for a new org was under way.
This is not debatable. It has been verified by many good people.
However, you chose to believe their denials, and still continue to support and uplift these men even though their actions can be viewed as nothing short of deceptive.
Please tell me how you can honestly and objectively chastise men who sign the affirmation statement with no intent to abide by it, while at the same time commending this Tulsa group, who have obviously engaged in unethical and deceptive behavior?
Where is your consistency?