Quote:
Originally Posted by Steadfast
You might be surprised to know that I agree with you for the most part. I think the reall issue has MUCH more to do with the direction they feel others are heading than it does with any particular standards.
As to California as compared to some of the other districts? You are exactly right.
|
Yet, as you very well know, they are a large enough group to sway votes at gen. conf. but they didn't stay in the fight. They could have controlled the direction.
Because we have held these men in such high esteem, it is beyond our finite minds to believe they have been less than ethical. Nearly everyone of the executive committee lost district or regional positions by very narrow margins. This leads the general population to believe they desire position so much they will form their own organization to guarantee their status. We are once again back at square one struggling to believe it could possibly be eogs as the driving force. Even so, there isn't anything wrong with desiring position.....unless you lose your ethics in so doing.