Quote:
Originally Posted by Steadfast
RevBuddy,
Your points generally have some merit. I've no problem with legitimate points. I have a problem with personal attacks.
And, as for my font, I've been around here a LONG time in these forums. My font has always been just as it is now.
I kind of like it. It makes it easier to see if someone is replying to a post.
As to you points? I can see how some think it's that way but, in all honesty, I just don't see it that way. I think that, at least with 95% of the people who are going to find their fellowship with the Tulsa crew, they just got tired of seeing issues that were valuable to them diminished further and further.
That was, before I was called a liar, my original point; I think that some are just tired of seeing the things they value compromised in front of their people. The television aspect was, in my gut honest opinion, just the 'final straw' that broke the camels back for most of them.
|
Steadfast, at the risk of banning I am going to address this again.
You were the one (back in October) who assured us that a new org wasn't in the works. When many, many posters affirmed otherwise - you body-slammed them and said their opinion was akin to wild speculation (paraphrase).
So Friend, I have some respect for you, but your credibility has taken a hit here.
Could it be that your bias clouded your judgement?
Again, I was banned over that whole conversation (a first for me), but I still feel just as strongly as I did back then that these men fully intended to do what they are doing now.
How else can you explain Kevin Prince as the only anti-tv speaker on the floor of GC this year.
LB was silent.
JG was silent.
NW was silent.
If this issue was so important, why the silence?
The answer is clear.
They already had a plan.