View Single Post
  #2  
Old 02-11-2008, 11:02 PM
ManOfWord's Avatar
ManOfWord ManOfWord is offline
Honorary Admin


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Sandusky, Ohio
Posts: 6,287
Re: Baptismal Formula

Quote:
Originally Posted by freeatlast View Post
A course in the jewish roots of the early church should be a requuirement to get a licence.

We'd not have near the controversersies and heresy's in our midst if we all knew Hebraic history.

...and am not talking about just reading the Old Testament.
I totally agree!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kutless View Post
Thanks MOW I totally respect your POV.



You did say that you have baptizeed someone that way right?
Certainly not as a normal practice. I have before, but mainly to make a point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Hoover View Post
At risk of being labeled something other than Oneness, I don't think I can agree with this statement.

Jesus never claimed to be the Father of the Only Begotton Son.

Well, I guess, technically, you're correct. But you know what I mean from a UPCI background point of view.


I could get myself in trouble as well by saying that I don't agree with the statement that Jesus is God. I do not believe the Bible states that. The Bible does states that Jesus was God manifest in flesh. There is a difference between Jesus and God, but it's certainly not two persons!
__________________
"Those who go after the "Sauls" among us often slay the Davids among us." Gene Edwards
Executive Servant
http://www.newlife-church.org
Reply With Quote