View Single Post
  #7  
Old 01-24-2009, 07:01 PM
mfblume's Avatar
mfblume mfblume is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portage la Prairie, MB CANADA
Posts: 38,161
Re: The book of Enoch

Quote:
Originally Posted by staysharp View Post
Blume, the only problem with this logic is we know that some of the books we have today in the New Testament have been tampered with. Jewish scholars reject the virgin birth due to the fact some scriptures do not appear in earlier versions.

We also know that the original book of Enoch was widely read and circulated among early Christians.

I know we want to think that "God" has preserved His word, but God has man to contend with...
There was an original book of Enoch. But the one we know about today was not it. I never said a book did not exist. But I did say that although it existed, I fully believe it is not in our bibles because God did not need it to be there. Although God has man to contend with, I think God would superced that with His abilityt o preserve what He willed to be repserved despite that. Is He not able to do that?
__________________
...MY THOUGHTS, ANYWAY.

"Many Christians do not try to understand what was written in a verse in the Bible. Instead they approach the passage to prove what they already believe."
Reply With Quote