Quote:
Originally Posted by bhoutreach
NO I am not. How ever It is clear that there should be clothing that is distinctly mens and distinctly womens.
If women have dress and skirts. Plus wear pants. Then men have nothing that is distinct to men. This is a problem.
|
lol
You know we're just having a good conversation. I mean no offense in any of this, though I might use some strong words at some point to drive home a point. If women's "pants" aren't distinctively female then you're asserting that men can wear them. If you argue that men shouldn't wear women's pants, you're affirming that women's pants are distinctively female. Besides, my studies have indicated that pants were originally designed in ancient China for
women working in the rice patties. The Chinese cavalry eventually took these pants and began wearing them as part of horse riding attire. Soon this caught on through most of the civilized world as part of riding attire, primarily worn by military men on horseback. Interestingly, hose were originally worn by men...but today are strictly worn by women. lol
I'm curious, where do you believe that the Bible requires this "distinction"?