Quote:
Originally Posted by Kutless
Seems as though an infallible Word should give us an infallible understanding.
I understand that great efforts were put forth to perserve the Old Test. Were the same taken for the New?
Reading a book that tauts the following: "Over 200yrs seperate the original New Testament writings and the earliest copies in existence."
The writer questions the agreement of the most ancient manuscripts as to what books were to be included.
I do hope that the sarcasm can be kept to a minimum. I am genuine in my questioning.
|
There are many theories that abound when comes to inerrancy, as one who has sat in some graduate level classes on this subject, I am confident that the NT we hold is reliable and that everything having to do with matters of faith, salvation and life are completely 100% accurate. And yet to be truthful there are some minor variations and descrepancies. I believe that the originals are 100% accurate and inerrant, and the copies that we have today are totally reliable.
Here is a nice link with both sides of the arguement.
http://mb-soft.com/believe/text/inerranc.htm