Quote:
Originally Posted by Jermyn Davidson
Dude,
FOX wanted equal access and when it had the chance to inform its viewers on something that was not-so-partisan, they didn't try to backspin it.
They didn't even show up!!!
POOH on FOX news.
The decision to not cover it was completely obsurd and yeah, this GOP'er calls foul on this too.
This was so unbelievably blatant-- but FOX viewers will not have that point of view at all. Neither will they have the point of view that that our President is trying to not be so partisan.
|
It was a business decision. Also, FoxNews IS balanced and does their part to present both sides of the aisle.
I read through the transcripts that HuffPost had of BHO's Q&A session with the Democrats. Most of it was the usual BHO line: blame Bush, blame the Republicans, Republicans are obstructionists, blah blah blah.
After reading the transcript, I don't blame FoxNews for not showing it live. They would've lost a ton of viewers.
As far as the last line about BHO trying not to be so partisan ... HA! BHO is only doing so because of Brown's win in MA and the Dems loss of the majority. It was the Republicans who invited BHO to their congressional meeting. BHO is as partisan as you can get.