Quote:
Originally Posted by geekette
Since it's a civil suit and not a criminal case, it's not a matter of guilt or innocence. Rather, it's a matter of whether or not he committed the actions and whether those actions rise to the level of a tort (wrong) that should be compensated by money damages.
And yes, if he did the acts, he should be exposed, but...going to law can cause all sorts of personal havoc. Just my personal opinion.
|
If the plaintiffs followed with this civil case after the Bishop had lost a criminal case, the outlook would change.
From the report, the crimiinal history of the plaintiffs may impeach their testimony.