R. Saulters, an ex-UPCI preacher, wrote an article explaining why he left the org which is also featured on the NCO website.
http://www.newchurchorder.com/content/view/59/44/
A Place for You
For the past fourteen years, I have shared a burden with many whom I consider to be my "Spiritual Brothers" and that burden is to take “The Whole Gospel to The Whole World”. Through many concerted efforts I have enjoyed wonderful occasions of fellowship, and as these relationships formed through fellowship, I was brought together with like-minded men and women in mutually exclusive causes for the Kingdom’s sake. During the seven years I was privileged to travel as an Evangelist, I discovered many noble men of integrity and character who displayed a love for righteousness and truth.
In October of last year, after many months of seeking God’s direction for my life and ministry, the Lord gave me specific instructions regarding the steps that He had ordered for me. As a result, I formally submitted my resignation and immediate withdrawal from an organized religious system which attempts to manipulate and control, rather than release and empower.
My resignation was not over a doctrinal difference nor was it enveloped in personal grievance. As I did then, I do now affirm Biblical doctrine, apostolic witness, and sanctity of lifestyle. I was, I am, and I shall continue to be an Apostolic preacher! There are no personal animosities held and no perfunctory disputes ongoing. I had no desire then, nor do I now, to cause any undue conflict within the organizational system that I was affiliated with and it has never been my intention to influence anyone to pursue the path I am compelled to follow.
My decision to withdraw my membership was for me, one of character. I had agreed, when extended the privilege of fellowship within this particular organizational structure, to adhere to, stand for, and follow ALL of its bylaws. I also agreed to not be personally involved in anything that might be perceived as causing disunity or division within the body of this ministry group that I was in covenant with.
However, as you know, in time we find ourselves evolving and maturing and as a result, careful examination of the methods once ascribed to becomes necessary for continued growth. It is in this process that we discover great value and liberation in many things and yet, it is here that we also realize the insignificance, restrictive nature and smallness of others. Of course, in the context of this process our bounds must be firmly set within Biblical doctrine and mandates. In my case, the chaff that came from this time of threshing was only relegated to areas of so called “personal conscience” issues and the resulting culture of legalism that is created when the by-laws and judgments of men are elevated to a superior position over God’s.
I have found that legalism is an oft misunderstood term that is used loosely to support a myriad of actions, most of which are borne out of the carnal mind. So, for me, legalism is not:
- The formatting of rules, the creating of guidelines nor the application of certain standards.
Legalism is the result of a centrality in focus upon the absolute adherence to codes of conduct established by men, which ignore the relevance of character and inner purity. This misdirected concentration leads ultimately to the excessive trust and reliance on man-made legislation for the security of righteousness. The fallacy of this is that it fails to ascertain the fact that true righteousness begins and is molded in the “inner sanctum” of the human heart and not in the “show” of fleshly performance that many have become so proficient at putting on display. It is my firm conviction that there are some things that should NEVER become the basis of fellowship, nor should anyone be expected to attest to them personally.
It has been my observation that most all “religious” organizational entities appear in action and attitude to be more interested in preserving and protecting their "Political Machine" and the image that its “named” ministers portray, rather than be willing to censure their own who have:
- Perverted true spiritual authority through a pseudo-witchcraft of control tactics, fear and manipulation;
- Made attempts to destroy and dismantle anyone who may disagree in areas of leadership style or modes of function within the body;
- Consistently shown a propensity to inflate numbers for the sake of ego and self aggrandizement;
- Given a prophetic voice that has proven to be false after the “appointed time”;
- Created a hierarchy of nepotism that has produced a generation of “names” who are not qualified and lack true anointing.
Tragically, while it appears that nothing is done to stop the critical indifferences created by those who sit in judgment, many people have fallen by the wayside, having never been given the opportunity to express their God given gifts and talents simply because the movement they have placed so much confidence in is absolutely incapable of looking deeper than the visible, vocal or financial.
While the hierarchy of “Religiosity” spends valuable time legislating more addendums to articles and agendas to programs, their relevance to our culture (to which it has been called to reach with the gospel) is nonexistent and its methods completely outdated.
A dear friend of mine recently commented that the devil couldn’t stop the Messiah, so he hired the religious people of Jesus’ day to do it for him. There is NOTHING that stifles the life and creativity of the people of God and their work, like the spirit of religion working through the minds and hands of carnal churchmen.
In light of all of the aforementioned differences and the converging truths associated with properly correcting this error, I felt obligated to withdraw my membership from such a structure so that I could remain true to the intents that I declared at the genesis of my ministerial life and fellowship.
It is interesting to note that between the chapters of
Acts 1 through 8, (which constitutes some 15-20 years according to most scholars), we clearly see the phenomenal growth the New Testament Church enjoyed. It was ever expanding during this time period. It is also noted that the perpetuity of the church has been placed in the hands of its leaders.
The early church encompassed true revival with growth from 120 to 3,000, and then it magnificently grew to over 5,000 men. Soon after, the writers can only list its membership as ... multitudes.
Furthermore, by
Acts 8 we witness entire cities being converted. However, something begins to stifle and restrict the life of the church in the next few chapters and tragically by
Acts 10 only households are being converted and by the time we read the record of chapter 19 - the great post - “Day of Pentecost” Revival that had shook the world some 30 years before has now dwindled to a hand full of misguided but sincere disciples of an incomplete gospel.
Clearly, the culprit is found within the confines of chapters 10-15:
It is here that policies and politics become involved and egos and eccentrics are placed in vocal but selective seats of judgment. Rather than allow men to follow the leading of the Spirit and be true to their calling, the ministry is now required to explain every evangelism tactic, as well as to validate its results. Committees are formed, legislation is demanded, schisms are birthed…and the life of revival is gone!
But if there is one valuable lesson to be learned and it is this ... Careful study reveals that the surprising core of the churches digression was not DOCTRINAL at all. It was simply the challenge to make the gospel more socially and culturally relevant, as well as accessible. It was the catalyst of change that offended those who had been “doing it” the same way for 30 years who were unwilling to even suppose or think that perhaps God was leading them to try something new!
In Revelation chapter 3, God gives a stunning and lethal rebuke to a church that appeared to have it all. He spoke of His desire to see them be hot or cold, because their lukewarmness only nauseated Him. This passage had held my attention for a long time, because in all my years of ministry, I have never understood why God would rather a “cold soul” than one who was at least “partially warm“.
Yet, after careful study and meditation on these verses, I discovered that the church to which these words were penned had no permanent, self-supplying water source. Thus, Laodicea relied upon two specific cities to provide their natural need of water. One city was Hierapolis, which sat some 10 miles North of Laodicea and had copious, medicinal “hot springs” that found there source in subterranean lava vents. The other city was Colossae, which sat some 7 miles East of Laodicea and boasted “cool artesian” springs.
Aqua-ducts were built to service Laodicea’s poor drinking conditions, but the tragedy was that by the time the water from the two cities converged at Laodicea ... the water was just a tepid lukewarm. It was too cool to heal, but it was to warm to refresh. The end result is a Savior on the outside, looking in at a church that failed to realize they had missed their purpose; to be an extension of God to a lost and hurting world.
The purpose of the church is not to legislate codes of conduct, nor to insulate its members from the world. The church has been called to reach the masses with “minimal” restriction and abundant provision. This time, this season of life demand that we use every embellishment and resource available and then reach for new venues of communication so that, at least some may hear the glorious Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Continued ....
I am not quite as bold as you, my little brother (I'm 48)!
Linear Mode
