Reckhart Blast the UPC again

[UnTraditional]

Originally Posted by Evang.Benincasa

What?

When were you with Reckart?

Was it for a day? A week?

William, do yourself a favor, don't comment on anything about your past. Because it will just end up with you looking really bad.

Ok?

Oh, and that crack you made to me in the other thread about my view on eschatology? Confirmed to me your total lack on honest humility and wisdom. I'm the last guy on this forum you should try to rattle my cage.

You know... don't go there. That crack was a smirkish push. Nothing meant. But, do NOT bully me. I am not the kind of person who shys away from people who bully me. And preachers who think they can bully me have found out they are not as big as they think. If you cannot take a joke, then I apologize for triggering you and upsetting you.

As for the comment I made, sir, this is America and as long as one can, one does have the right to freedom of speech and expression. So, I choose to exercise it. So, either we can call a truce, of course that would be civil, or try to online bully me and find out I am not the easy pushover I once was.

So, check your attitude and we can discuss this. Thank you.

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by UnTraditional

You know... don't go there. That crack was a smirkish push. Nothing meant. But, do NOT bully me. I am not the kind of person who shys away from people who bully me. And preachers who think they can bully me have found out they are not as big as they think. If you cannot take a joke, then I apologize for triggering you and upsetting you.

As for the comment I made, sir, this is America and as long as one can, one does have the right to freedom of speech and expression. So, I choose to exercise it. So, either we can call a truce, of course that would be civil, or try to online bully me and find out I am not the easy pushover I once was.

So, check your attitude and we can discuss this. Thank you.

When were you with Reckart?

How long with you with the Cohen?

[diakonos]

Originally Posted by UnTraditional

You know... don't go there. That crack was a smirkish push. Nothing meant. But, do NOT bully me. I am not the kind of person who shys away from people who bully me. And preachers who think they can bully me have found out they are not as big as they think. If you cannot take a joke, then I apologize for triggering you and upsetting you.

As for the comment I made, sir, this is America and as long as one can, one does have the right to freedom of speech and expression. So, I choose to exercise it. So, either we can call a truce, of course that would be civil, or try to online bully me and find out I am not the easy pushover I once was.

So, check your attitude and we can discuss this. Thank you.

[TJJJ]

D Benincasa only wishes he looks as good now as he did on the wall of shame......

He's have to dye his hair to have it that dark!

Bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

[diakonos]

He was part of the internet mafia

[Sister Alvear]

Does he still have a website?

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by Sister Alvear

Does he still have a website?

But of course, a guy like him couldn't go without publicity.

He is the Cohen.

[diakonos]

Originally Posted by Sister Alvear

Does he still have a website?

He had a blog

http://thejewishjesus.blogspot.com/2...ckart.html?m=1

[Evang.Benincasa]

Originally Posted by diakonos

He had a blog

http://thejewishjesus.blogspot.com/2...ckart.html?m=1

Nothing current?

He must be getting old.

He made great scallop potatoes.

[Michael The Disciple]

Reckart came in my Paltalk room once. He listened for a good while putting positive texts in the message area. After a while I started teaching about the legalistic standards of the Churches.

He came to the mic and said "I was with you on everything you said up till now. I dont remember seeing him afterwards. While I know several key issues where I disagree with him I did find something of high interest on his site concerning the doctrine of the Logos.

Reckart:

We know very little about God other than he is a Spirit. We know even less about the composition of his Spirit. But we do know that his Spirit has form. We have reason to believe the angels knew this Spirit Creator as God (Elohim) and Lord (Adonai). God's spirit has a bodily form to the angels. We know God has a head, eyes, ears, nose, mouth, arms, hands, fingers, legs, and feet. This body form is the visible God the created angels could see. But did God always have this body form? Did he emanate this body image and likeness so his angelic creation could see him? Many believe this is the origin of the Lordship of God. In heaven God is the Lord of glory. It appears that God emanated a visible body image in which he became manifest as the Lord to the angels. This spiritual body and God were united in a spiritstatic union which would never be dissolved. God would be seen in this mode-image-form and the created angels would have this body form. Angels have the same body image and likeness as God. Adam was made in this same body-image-form although much lower in spiritual rank than the angels (Heb 2:7-9).

It is believed by many that the Lordship of God, his spiritual body, his first creation, his first emanation, was the beginning of the Sonship of the spiritual body of God (Eddings, p 16). This can be referred to as the beginning of the creation of God. But emanation is existence different than created beings and cannot be compared. Creation beings are distinct separate creatures that have no divinity. And we must remember the first acts of these creations occurred in heaven before the creation that began in Genesis 1:1. An emanation is completely divine and shares eternal properties of God himself. God was the Father of his own Lordship, his own spiritual body. This spiritual body form would later be called the Logos, the Word, by the Apostle John in John 1:1, or the visible image that God emanated from his mind or reason. From this spiritual image and form made manifest, God would speak and begin the creation of angels and then that of Genesis 1:1. The form of God be it spiritual or human must contain Lordship. Whether God revealed himself in Spirit form or human form, the manifestation would be one of Sonship which we must understand as emanation. The image form was God/Lord in heaven, Jesus to the world, and Messieh or Christ to Israel. Jesus is the Lord Jesus Christ when we bring all these modes of God into the unity of absolute oneness.

What did Jesus mean when he said: "No man knoweth the Father but the Son, and he to whom the Son will reveal him (Matt 11:27)? Did not many Old Testament men know God? What was it about God they did not know that only Jesus knew? What did Jesus mean when he said: "What and if ye shall see the son of man ascend up where he was before" (John 6:62)? Obviously Jesus was speaking about a pre-existing unity relationship between the invisible Father and the visible Son in one body form. This relationship on earth was one of manifestation of the Father in the veil of the Son, his image, his form, his earthly mode of revelation. The Son was the image of the Father, even as a natural son born into a family comes in the image of his father. Adam in the image of God and all sons afterward in the image of Adam, all bearing witness to the form and image of one God in heaven. And through this earthy image the Creator could be seen by mankind even as the angels could see God in a spiritual form in heaven. Was Jesus speaking about himself being the express image through which God manifested himself in heaven and upon the earth? Yes! Is this image and manifestation the unity of the Father and the Son and are they then the same God and the same person? Yes! Or does the image itself become a separate God from that which dwells within it? No!

This is pretty much the doctrine of Logos as I believe it.