Apostolic Friends Forum
Tab Menu 1
Go Back   Apostolic Friends Forum > The D.A.'s Office
Facebook

Notices

The D.A.'s Office The views expressed in this forum are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of AFF or the Admin of AFF.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 07-27-2007, 11:15 AM
NLYP's Avatar
NLYP NLYP is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind View Post
So what is considered by many as false seems to not matter in that the UN of the Apostolics will solve all?

Sounds a bit off center.

So by this token, any whim and wind of doctrine is overlooked?
Lets keep this thread on course......as you have stated many times BOOM, a thread should not be hijacked.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 07-27-2007, 11:16 AM
SDG SDG is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Amos View Post
You cannot avoid this issue if you are going to discuss them.

The fact that they are content to fellowship rank heresy speaks volumes about their foundation and intent.
A legitimate concern ... but I'd like to also discuss the nature of the NCO's and AWCF's cooperation ... it's effects on the ministry within the UPCI and Phillips role within the AWCF.

Does anyone think that the decision by NCO leaders to befriend the AWCF was calculated?
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 07-27-2007, 11:18 AM
Amos Amos is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
A legitimate concern ... but I'd like to also discuss the nature of the NCO's and AWCF's cooperation ... it's effects on the ministry within the UPCI and Phillips role within the AWCF.

Does anyone think that the decision by NCO leaders to befriend the AWCF was calculated?

I would doubt if it was whimsical or accidental.

The guys in charge aren't dumb.

Whether I agree with them or not, I don't think they are stupid, and I am sure they know what they are doing and have a purpose in mind.
__________________
"Then answered Amos, and said to Amaziah, I was no prophet, neither was I a prophet's son; but I was an herdman, and a gatherer of sycomore fruit:

And the LORD took me as I followed the flock, and the LORD said unto me, Go, prophesy unto my people Israel."


--Amos 7:14-15
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 07-27-2007, 11:19 AM
BoredOutOfMyMind's Avatar
BoredOutOfMyMind BoredOutOfMyMind is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a cold dark cave.....
Posts: 4,624
Quote:
Originally Posted by NLYP View Post
Lets keep this thread on course......as you have stated many times BOOM, a thread should not be hijacked.
This is about those disgruntled maybe joining a lib-moderate org.

Seems to some, that is the same as leaving doctrine behind.

Have we not heard that first the standards, then the doctrine.

I think the question is to be considered-

Does any whim and wind of teaching now surface in this new fellowship as acceptable?

This is why the Latter Rain movement was rejected by both the UPC and the AOG.
__________________
I am not a member here -Do not PM me please?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 07-27-2007, 11:20 AM
NLYP's Avatar
NLYP NLYP is offline
Registered Member


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
A legitimate concern ... but I'd like to also discuss the nature of the NCO's and AWCF's cooperation ... it's effects on the ministry within the UPCI and Phillips role within the AWCF.

Does anyone think that the decision by NCO leaders to befriend the AWCF was calculated?
I am a member of NCO.
Not sure if thats popular.....but...dont care.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 07-27-2007, 11:21 AM
SDG SDG is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
From the Randy Hollis thread ... PP confirms some behind the scenes "recruiting" or "offering a safety net".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pastor Poster View Post

I have a relative who has received calls from one of these organizations asking him to change his allegiance.

For years we have been warned the ultraconservatives would leave if the resolution passed. Now it seems there are options for those who will want to leave if the resolution dosn't pass.

Is this an organized effort to raid the UPC of libs and mods?
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 07-27-2007, 11:25 AM
BoredOutOfMyMind's Avatar
BoredOutOfMyMind BoredOutOfMyMind is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a cold dark cave.....
Posts: 4,624
Quote:
Originally Posted by NLYP View Post
I am a member of NCO.
Not sure if thats popular.....but...dont care.
I wonder if NCO membership is behind Resolution #3

:sshhh
__________________
I am not a member here -Do not PM me please?
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 07-27-2007, 11:33 AM
SDG SDG is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: H-Town, Texas
Posts: 18,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoredOutOfMyMind View Post
I wonder if NCO membership is behind Resolution #3

:sshhh
Probably. I'm sure some of the UC's are concerned with the inter-cooperation between these fellowships ...

Example: Resolution 3 would make events like this at a UPCI church like that of Glenn Purvis in Conyers, Georgia a "no-no" if a district board officially places WH on their in questionable list.



http://www.cljcworship.com/
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 07-27-2007, 11:34 AM
BoredOutOfMyMind's Avatar
BoredOutOfMyMind BoredOutOfMyMind is offline
Guest


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In a cold dark cave.....
Posts: 4,624
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
Probably. I'm sure some of the UC's are concerned with the inter-cooperation between these fellowships ...
Actually some are not even knowledgable of this type of new organization being formed.
__________________
I am not a member here -Do not PM me please?
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 07-27-2007, 11:38 AM
Monkeyman's Avatar
Monkeyman Monkeyman is offline
www.capitalcommunity.ca


 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,300
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daniel Alicea View Post
Probably. I'm sure some of the UC's are concerned with the inter-cooperation between these fellowships ...

Example: Resolution 3 would make events like this at a UPCI church like that of Glenn Purvis in Conyers, Georgia a "no-no" if a district board officially places WH on their in questionable list.



http://www.cljcworship.com/
Ok, his flyer says that he is one of most creative leaders this century??!!! Really?? When you start a phrase like that, I a dumb monkey, start disregarding anything else written. Maybe that is just me. Not trying to knock the dude or anything he has done, but a statement this large better be backed up. wow.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
If your church board told you, "Leave the UPCI" - Or leave this Church???? Neck Fellowship Hall 40 04-01-2008 04:11 PM
"Today, A Sad Day For The Upci" Bishop1 Fellowship Hall 334 02-11-2008 05:04 PM
What was the UPCI "Philippines Fiasco" that Took Place in the late 1980s??? StillStanding Fellowship Hall 47 02-04-2008 10:09 PM
Seven kids get "it" or "Him" at youth camp Sherri Fellowship Hall 10 07-16-2007 01:57 PM

 
User Infomation
Your Avatar

Latest Threads
- by Salome
- by Costeon

Help Support AFF!

Advertisement




All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.