Was thousands of gallons of jet fuel the accelerate in the example you used of a skyscraper burning?
Apples and Oranges.
The bulk of the kerosene onboard the planes were detonated and burned off within about the first ten minutes. In fact, the second plane impact resulted in the majority of the jet fuel exploding through and outside of the building.
Please demonstrate how burning jet fuel (kerosene, a diesel derivative) can melt over 75 percent of the entire structure of a skyscraper WITHOUT "large, raging, infernos" being in place.
By the way, does anyone here ever use kerosene lamps or kerosene camping stoves? I wonder how many folks have had their grills melted as a result of this obviously super-powerful destructive open-air conflagration under the hot dogs they tried to cook...
There will always be those who seek out elaborate conspiratorial explanations for momentous events. Has been through time.
I am glad to see SAS escaped from the Island prison the Men In Black must have been keeping him captive in.
Hopefully he has found a way to foil the tracking bug the government has planted somewhere in his body or brain.
An d there are always those who seek out cheesy ad hominem personal attacks to hurl against those who simply ASK QUESTIONS and who point out that various THEORIES offered as "explanations" DO NOT ADD UP.
Remember, EVERY "solution" or "explanation" about what happened on 9-11 is a THEORY.
A "conspiracy theory" to be precise, since EVERY "solution" includes a CONSPIRACY of two or more people conspiring to bring the towers down.
So, it is not a question of "the truth versus conspiracy theories". It is simply a matter of "which conspiracy theory best explains the available evidence."
Who has the facts, or at least links to articles detailing the facts, regarding the bridge collapse?
Anyone?
Every major news outlet covered it because of the terrible traffic jams it is causing. Should be on CNN, MSNBC, FOX, and major newspapers. In particular I would imagine the San Francisco ones.
Gotta go, I think I hear a black helicopter coming.
The bulk of the kerosene onboard the planes were detonated and burned off within about the first ten minutes. In fact, the second plane impact resulted in the majority of the jet fuel exploding through and outside of the building.
Please demonstrate how burning jet fuel (kerosene, a diesel derivative) can melt over 75 percent of the entire structure of a skyscraper WITHOUT "large, raging, infernos" being in place.
By the way, does anyone here ever use kerosene lamps or kerosene camping stoves? I wonder how many folks have had their grills melted as a result of this obviously super-powerful destructive open-air conflagration under the hot dogs they tried to cook...
If there were bombs used inside the buildings as some have said, wouldn't folks have heard them denotate?
The structural integrity of the WTC towers were not so imparied by being hit by planes that they collapsed. NOBODY claims the IMPACT of the planes is what caused the towers to fall and pulverise on their way down at free fall speed.
It is the FIRE which is claimed to have "melted the steel" so badly the towers just collapsed, vaporizing on their way to ground zero.
However, the towers were DESIGNED to withstand jet plane impact. NO skyscraper EVER "collapsed" due to FIRE DAMAGE TO THE STEEL.
The picture above shows that even in a TOTALLY UNCONTROLLED RAGING INFERNO the steel does NOT "melt away into nothing".
Now, how about some FACTS?
Regarding the bridge, WHAT EXACTLY "melted" and what EXACTLY caused the upper level to collapse?
Was it the steel trusses themselves that "melted"?
Or the BOLTS?
Anyone got any FACTS for this discussion?
1. Those towers were built to withstand plane impact according to the planes in existence in 1969! They were small compared to the planes that hit those towers!
2. First time for everything. There are lots of unexplained things that have taken place that, if the same circumstance happened again, the result would probably be different.
3. Speaking of facts, where did you get yours?
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
If there were bombs used inside the buildings as some have said, wouldn't folks have heard them denotate?
More importantly, where did the bombs come from, and how long had they been in place, since there was no way they could have placed them with all that chaos in the space of less than two hours.....that's assuming the bomb placers were on the scene already.
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
And then there is the question as to whether Bush is actually smart enough to pull something like that off...
When someone thinks about the timeline involved, it's easy to dismiss the claims that someone sinister was in play. Even if they had the info in advance, the time it would take to put plans into place would have been longer than what they had to work with.
They had less than two hours in one tower, and less than three in the other. With all the chaos of literally thousands of people trying to escape, people on the ground burning, bodies falling, the crowd watching, and civil personnel barking orders, I highly doubt anything sinister was accomplished after the planes hit those towers, if that was indeed the plan.
__________________
I've gone and done it now! I'm on Facebook!!!
Linear Mode
