**NORTH DAKOTA** Have you heard???????@@@@ - Page 6

Thad · #1 11-06-2007, 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChicagoPastor

What's the use, he won't believe it anyhow.

and WHY is that ????

ChicagoPastor · #2 11-06-2007, 12:32 AM

I don't know amigo.
You've heard the rumor
I've heard the rumor
hopefully that's enough to make him a believer.

#3 11-06-2007, 12:34 AM

well i hear a rumor from two different people now. does that count?? lol

Thad · #4 11-06-2007, 12:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SisBeezer

well i hear a rumor from two different people now. does that count?? lol

well we shall see what Boomm has to say about ... if he says anything at all

#5 11-06-2007, 12:39 AM

well dont three rumors make truth? lol

Trouvere · #6 11-06-2007, 08:48 AM

Is this really true?

Pragmatist · #7 11-06-2007, 08:54 AM

North Dakota obviously is a small district. If the DS pulls out of the UPC, what are the other churches going to do? Join the South Dakota or Minnesota district? There wouldn't be much point or practicality to have a district for a handful of churches. Geographically, fellowship is difficult enough without having to go farther. I don't see that the other churches in ND have many options, but to follow the DS.

TRIPLE E · #8 11-06-2007, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pragmatist

North Dakota obviously is a small district. If the DS pulls out of the UPC, what are the other churches going to do? Join the South Dakota or Minnesota district? There wouldn't be much point or practicality to have a district for a handful of churches. Geographically, fellowship is difficult enough without having to go farther. I don't see that the other churches in ND have many options, but to follow the DS.

Maybe they will join with the Canadian Plains district if there is any left after Tulsa!

#9 11-06-2007, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pragmatist

North Dakota obviously is a small district. If the DS pulls out of the UPC, what are the other churches going to do? Join the South Dakota or Minnesota district? There wouldn't be much point or practicality to have a district for a handful of churches. Geographically, fellowship is difficult enough without having to go farther. I don't see that the other churches in ND have many options, but to follow the DS.

right off a cliff.

Pragmatist · #10 11-06-2007, 09:02 AM

I highly doubt any church in North Dakota will be advertising on TV anyway, so I don't see how this really affects them (other than the slippery slope argument).