Thanks, Miz. That's one I watched before, from that list you gave me a while back.
Interesting points. Some of the points were proving (if correct) it is historically accurate (in places), but not Divine inspiration -- anyone could have recorded historical events without God's help. And some points were weak, and he practically admitted it as he pointed out that the Book of Mormon and the Koran also qualify for
some of his "proofs".
It was odd for him to say that
Mormons' claims that God would confirm their book is true is bogus, but
his claim for the same thing for the Bible is not. It's also odd to dismiss what he calls "minor discrepancies" in the Gospel accounts. How "major" would a discrepancy have to be to count? Is it a matter of personal taste?
More later. Probably.
My soul followeth hard after thee....Love one another with a pure heart fervently. 
Linear Mode
