*EXPLOSIVE* TF Tenney Preached 4 Phillips Sunday - Page 13

Amos · #**121** 11-14-2008, 06:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Phelps

Does anyone know for sure that TFT did NOT call the UPC pastors in the area first?

Or are we all assuming that he didn't, therefore is in violation of the manual?

Preaching for a man under question is a violation, period.

There is no provision for "it's ok if the DS says it's ok." At least, not to my knowledge.

Now, we all know that a personage as large as TFT can do what he wants.

I like Brother Tenney well enough, and have heard him preach some wonderful messages, but the fact is I wish he would think about the example he is setting with those who revere him.

All his dabbling around with TBN, Phillips, and various other charismatics has yet to bring one of them our way--but a lot of young men that look up to TFT have gone there way.

Michael Phelps · #**122** 11-14-2008, 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amos

Preaching for a man under question is a violation, period.

There is no provision for "it's ok if the DS says it's ok." At least, not to my knowledge.

Now, we all know that a personage as large as TFT can do what he wants.

I like Brother Tenney well enough, and have heard him preach some wonderful messages, but the fact is I wish he would think about the example he is setting with those who revere him.

All his dabbling around with TBN, Phillips, and various other charismatics has yet to bring one of them our way--but a lot of young men that look up to TFT have gone there way.

What makes you think Bro. Phillips is "under question"?

Amos · #**123** 11-14-2008, 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michael Phelps

What makes you think Bro. Phillips is "under question"?

That is fairly common knowledge.

MissBrattified · #**124** 11-14-2008, 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amos

That is fairly common knowledge.

For at least a couple of decades....

I think it's wrong, though, that he should have that status. After all these years, he is still strong in Apostolic doctrine, despite dire predictions to the contrary.

Presently, the look of his church is no different from several other southern UPCI churches, and so I guess I don't know what the problem is, at least, not now.

Michael Phelps · #**125** 11-14-2008, 07:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amos

That is fairly common knowledge.

Apparently not common enough, I wasn't aware of it.

Why is he under question? Because he left the UPC in 1977?

And, I'm not being argumentative, I'm seriously asking.

Michael Phelps · #**126** 11-14-2008, 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MissBrattified

For at least a couple of decades....

I think it's wrong, though, that he should have that status. After all these years, he is still strong in Apostolic doctrine, despite dire predictions to the contrary.

Presently, the look of his church is no different from several other southern UPCI churches, and so I guess I don't know what the problem is, at least, not now.

Exactly.

I'm not sure if there is a statute of limitations on being under question.

Usually, guys are put "under question" for moral issues, major doctrinal issues, or proselytizing. I am not sure if KP was ever accused of any of these things.

And, if a man is under question, I doubt that his wife would be allowed to play the organ and sing at organizational, or at least organizationally approved, functions.

rgcraig · #**127** 11-14-2008, 07:37 AM

It's been over 30 years...........how sad.

deltaguitar · #**128** 11-14-2008, 07:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sam

But, Delta Guitar, have you ever given your heart to Jesus and asked Him to come in? If so, He came in, whether you spoke with tongues then or since.
(My opinion as a one-stepper)
and, yes, I speak with tongues just about every day.
Do all? obviously not.

Thank you Bro. Sam. God has given me peace about this.

Melody · #**129** 11-14-2008, 09:18 AM

as long as one holds to the truth, but to exalt a false doctrine, one you are suppose to believe is false?

exalting jim bakker and commending him and phillips? when you are supposedly believing they are leading them astray?

sad indeed

rgcraig · #**130** 11-14-2008, 09:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Melody

as long as one holds to the truth, but to exalt a false doctrine, one you are suppose to believe is false?

exalting jim bakker and commending him and phillips? when you are supposedly believing they are leading them astray?

sad indeed

Not sure what you are really saying here?

Are you saying someone is exalting Jim Baker and you are comparing Baker with Phillips?